"Love follows knowledge."
"Beauty above all beauty!"
– St. Catherine of Siena

Showing posts with label Inferno. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inferno. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Literature in the News: Dantedì

Dantedì refers to the holiday celebrating the great Italian poet, Dante Alighieri.  



From the website, ItalianTraditions. 

March 25th is celebrated throughout Italy on Dantedì, the national day dedicated to Dante Alighieri, father of the Italian language and author of the Divine Comedy. This date is not random: scholars recognize it as the day the otherworldly journey begins narrated in his masterpiece, a universal symbol of search, redemption and knowledge.

Established in 2020, Dantedì represents a precious opportunity to rediscover the current events of Dante and the value of his work. It is not just a tribute to literature, but a moment to reflect on Italian cultural identity and the power of the word as tool for thinking and transformation.

Well, that is incomplete.  In a day to reflect on the value of Dante’s Divine Comedy and on the Italy’s deep and grand culture, but also on today’s date, the traditional date assigned to the Blessed Virgin Mary assent to being the Mother of God.  So today is a confluence of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary and the day Dante the character spent in Hell.  Of course it’s not a coincidence.  It is widely known that Dante the author starts the pilgrimage of Dante the character on Good Friday of the year 1300.  What is not as widely well known, though growing in circulation, is that Good Friday of the year 1300 happened to be March 25th, which would make it on the same day as the Feast of the Annunciation.  So the greatest Catholic poem ever written, also the greatest Italian poem ever written—heck, the greatest poem, period, ever written—sets the start of the action on both Good Friday and the Feast of the Annunciation.

On this Feast Day primarily of the Annunciation and secondarily of Dantedì, I wish to commemorate with first let’s start with a clip from the great Zeffirelli movie, Jesus of Nazareth, the Annunciation scene.

 


Second, I want to quote from the beginning of Dante’s Inferno, the first canto where Dante the character is lost in a wood.  From the wonderful Hollander and Hollander translation which can be found at the Princeton Dante Project.

 

              1            Midway in the journey of our life

2            I came to myself in a dark wood,

3            for the straight way was lost.

4            Ah, how hard it is to tell

5            the nature of that wood, savage, dense and harsh --

6            the very thought of it renews my fear!

7            It is so bitter death is hardly more so.

              8            But to set forth the good I found

9            I will recount the other things I saw.

10         How I came there I cannot really tell,

11         I was so full of sleep

12         when I forsook the one true way.

13         But when I reached the foot of a hill,

14         there where the valley ended

15         that had pierced my heart with fear,

16         looking up, I saw its shoulders

17         arrayed in the first light of the planet

18         that leads men straight, no matter what their road.

19         Then the fear that had endured

20         in the lake of my heart, all the night

21         I spent in such distress, was calmed.

22         And as one who, with laboring breath,

23         has escaped from the deep to the shore

24         turns and looks back at the perilous waters,

25         so my mind, still in flight,

26         turned back to look once more upon the pass

27         no mortal being ever left alive.

28         After I rested my wearied flesh a while,

29         I took my way again along the desert slope,

30         my firm foot always lower than the other.

                             Inferno, Canto 1, 1-30.


Finally, hear Dante’s beautiful Italian with a recitation of Inferno’s Canto 1 by the great Italian actor, Roberto Benigni.


Blessed Mother, ever Virgin, pray for us.




Saturday, May 8, 2021

Dante’s Inferno, Canto VIII

A friend of mine, Mary Sue, is doing a term paper using Dante’s Canto VIII from his Inferno as part of a larger main point which ties into T.S. Eliot’s great poem, Ash Wednesday. So Mary Sue intrigued me enough to go back and read Canto VIII, which then planted a seed of interest in me that compelled me to think about it for days.  I realize this can happen on any one of Dante’s one hundred cantos from his Commedia.  So let me provide the fruits of my thoughts and perhaps it may help my friend.

When I posted on the entire Divine Comedy back in 2018 to 2019, other than summarizing that canto, I did not find the time to write on it.  (You can find links to all my Dante blog posts above in the Header Bar with the hyperlink, “Dante Links.”)  I had wished I could comment on every canto, but that was impossible at the time.  Perhaps slowly in time as a need arises I can fill in the cantos that I missed.

So in Canto VII, to back up a little, Dante and Virgil are walking through the fifth circle of hell, that of anger and sullenness, down the bank to the river Styx.  At the river there is a bog in which the souls of the fifth circle wade in the mud and filthy water.  Here the wrathful fight and tear at each other in everlasting anger.

Which brings us to Canto VIII.  At the bank Virgil and Dante observe a tower at the other side of the river flashing two lights of fire and further back another flashing light responded in a returning signal.  This causes Dante to ask Virgil for its meaning.


And turning to that sea of wisdom, I asked:

'What does this mean? And that other fire,

what does it answer? And who are they who made it?'

 

And he to me: 'Over the filthy waves

you may already glimpse what is to come,

if the marsh-fumes do not hide it from you.' (7-12)

I am using the wonderful Robert and Jean Hollander (husband and wife team) translation.  As I’ve said before in my Dante posts, this is my preferred translation.

So Dante asks some rather obvious questions, and Virgil doesn’t really answer them, only perhaps to imply he will find out shortly.  What captures my curiosity is the epithet Dante uses for Virgil in verse seven: “the sea of wisdom.”  (The use of an epithet for a proper in name in rhetoric is called antonomasia.)  Here Virgil is associated with wisdom but couched in a metaphor of the sea.  The metaphor is not a function of the translation.  It’s there in the Italian: “al mar di tutto 'l senno.”

Anthony Esolen in his translation annotates that Virgil is punning with mar on Virgil’s last name of “Maro.”  That is possible but I do think it goes beyond that.  Certainly Virgil is associated with wisdom, but “sea” brings in the naval term that runs throughout the Divine Comedy.  In fact we will see a boat speed to them in the very next set of triplets from where I quoted.  In addition to the naval metaphor, I think the “sea of wisdom” is a contrasting epithet to the Ulysses character we will see in Canto XXVI.  There we will hear of Ulysses’ tale of taking his crew on a voyage of exploration that leads to their destruction.  He who had the reputation of wisdom—Ulysses—was unwise in his pride.    

What comes next is the arrival of the bark that will take them across the river, but Dante (the author—I will need to distinguish between Dante the author and Dante the character) frames it in a fascinating simile.

 

Never did a bowstring loose an arrow

that whipped away more swiftly through the air

than, even as I watched, a skiff came skimming

 

straight toward us on the water,

under the guidance of a single helmsman,

crying: 'Now you are caught, damned spirit!'  (13-18)

The boat, racing in, is compared to a flying arrow.  One envisions a speed boat here, and I find that remarkable in itself given there is no such speed boat or any speedy vehicle in Dante’s time.  That’s a remarkable image when you realize that it would be outside of Dante’s experience to envision such speed.  That conceit to archery will appear repeatedly in the Divine Comedy (see Inf XII, XXXI, Pur XXV, XXXI, Par I, VII and elsewhere).  Ships and boats also appear often throughout the Commedia.  They emphasize the pilgrimage as the central objective of our lives, the pilgrimage to God.  Charon’s ferry in Inferno Canto III is one example.  The speed of Phlegyas’ boat in VIII recalls the swift speed of the ship in Purgatorio Canto II that ferries the souls to the Purgatory island.  Even the opening lines of Purgatorio are framed in a ferry conceit: “To run its course through smoother water/the small bark of my wit now hoists its sail,/leaving that cruel sea behind” (Pur I, 1-3).  Both naval and archery imagery are part of the overall web of imagery that underlies the themes of La Commedia.

So Phlegyas thinks he has caught two escaping souls as he comes upon Dante and Virgil, but Virgil sets him straight.

 

Phlegyas, Phlegyas, this time you shout in vain,'

replied my lord. 'You'll not have us any longer

than it takes to cross this bog.'

 

Like one who learns of a deceitful plot

that has been hatched against him and begins to fret,

such was Phlegyas in his stifled wrath. (19-24)

Phlegyas is frustrated in his expecting thrill, but I find the metaphor describing his reaction with deeper resonance.  Phlegyas is in wrath as one who learns of a deceit against him.  Well, Dante and Virgil are leaving the circle of anger and crossing over to the city of Dis, where all the various sins of deceit are placed.  Phlegyas in anger is echoing his surroundings, and his “fretting” foreshadows Dante’s fretting when he and Virgil later in the canto are locked out from entering the gates of Dis once they are ferried across.   


The two get in the boat, encounter the soul of Felippo Argenti in the mire of the river, who tries to grasp Dante but is pushed into the filthy water by Virgil, and subsequently torn and beaten by the other damned in the river.  Dante in fighting off the soul of Argenti, curses him.  Virgil for this praises Dante.

 

Then my master put his arms around my neck,

kissed my face and said: 'Indignant soul,

blessed is she that bore you in her womb! (43-45)

Why does Virgil praise Dante (the character) so here?  Most annotations will explain that Dante (the author) sees it as proper to take satisfaction in the justice done to damned souls—and being in hell the characters know that the soul is truly damned while we on earth can never know for certain.  But I find it fascinating that Virgil quotes Luke 11:27, “Blessed is the womb that bore you” as a woman cries out to Christ in praise.  I haven’t found any good annotation as to why Dante (the author) uses that quote here.  Certainly Dante (the character) is not deserving of the Christ allusion.  The only speculation I could propose—and this is me speculating, I have not found this commentary elsewhere—is that in referencing Mary’s womb, Dante (the author) is alluding to the ark of the covenant, furthering the naval imagery.  Certainly Dante (the character) is in a sort of ark on board Phlegyas’ boat. 

I have mentioned elsewhere how Dante usually structures his cantos in the Divine Comedy in three parts.  He does so here in Canto VII.  The first part (l. 1-27) is the opening scene leading to getting on board Phlegyas’ boat; the second (l. 28-63) is the scene with Filippo Argenti; the third (l. 64-130) is the landing on Dis and being locked out.

The city of Dis is of iron walls, separated by a moat, and heavily guarded by thousands of demons, suggesting an iron and a closed off heart.  It is the contrasting image of the “New Jerusalem,” from the Books of Ezekiel (OT) and Revelation (NT). The towers inside the ramparts appear to Dante (the pilgrim) as “mosques,” which Esolen points out are probably minarets, and glow red from an “eternal fire.”  Where Dante (the author) would have seen mosques and minarets is a mystery to me.  As far as I know his travels were limited to Italy and France. 

Upon being kicked out of the boat by Phlegyas (no one is kind in hell), a small drama ensues.  The angry demons refuse to let a living being into the city.  Virgil signals for Dante to hold back so he can arbitrate the situation, but the demons are immovable.  They will allow Virgil to pass, but they will not yield concerning Dante.

 

Then they reined in their great disdain

enough to say: 'You come -- alone. Let him be gone,

who has so boldly made his way into this kingdom.

 

'Let him retrace his reckless path alone --

let him see if he can, for you shall stay,

you who have led him through this gloomy realm.' (88-93)

This is where Dante frets and momentarily loses hope.  He begs Virgil to not leave him, and Virgil reassures him.

 

But the mentor who had brought me there replied:

'Have no fear. None can prevent our passage,

so great a power granted it to us.

 

'Wait for me here. Comfort your weary spirit

and feed it with good hope.

I will not forsake you in the nether world.' (103-108)

Two important points can be gleaned from Virgil’s response.  First, God has granted Dante’s passage, so the will of God cannot be resisted.  Second, Dante should not lose hope.  Hope is one of the theological virtues, and a virtue requires strengthening, almost like an exercise.  We see Dante (the character) here in these early cantos as spiritually immature.  He has not built up his virtue.

Finally Virgil leaves Dante while he walks over to the demons to mull the issue.  Dante sees them speaking but is out of hearing distance.  Suddenly the demons slam the gates shut against Virgil, who sullenly returns to Dante.  The remainder of the canto is worth quoting in its entirety.

 

He had his eyes upon the ground, his brows

shorn of all confidence. Sighing, he muttered:

'Who dares deny me access to the realm of pain?'

 

To me he said: 'Be not dismayed

at my vexation. In this contest I'll prevail,

whatever they contrive to keep us out.

 

'This insolence of theirs is nothing new:

they showed it once before, at another gate.

It still stands open without lock or bolt.

 

'Over it you saw the deadly writing.

Even now, making his unescorted way

down through the circles, one descends

by whom the city shall be opened.' (118-130)

We see Virgil’s virtue in contrast to Dante.  While he assesses the situation as serious, he does not give up hope.  He has hope in divine intervention.

We see the demons then are just being spiteful.  There is no reason why Dante cannot pass.  Their “insolence” is merely a resistance to the Divine Will.  If the Divine Will did not want Dante to enter, the demons would have lured him in.  Anything to be adversarial to God.

We will see in the next canto how a divinely sent angel arrives and with a touch of a wand, the gates opened up.  The Divine Will cannot be overcome.

What are we to make of Canto VIII?  We see the pilgrimage progress, the development of the naval and archery imagery, the justice of hell, the contrast of wrath with reason, the iron heart of Dis, and the testing of the theological virtue of hope.  Canto VIII is rich, but one can say that about all the cantos.

So how does Canto VIII relate to Eliot’s Ash Wednesday?  Well, the opening stanzas of Eliot’s poem are these:

 

Because I do not hope to turn again

Because I do not hope

Because I do not hope to turn

Desiring this man's gift and that man's scope

I no longer strive to strive towards such things

(Why should the agèd eagle stretch its wings?)

Why should I mourn

The vanished power of the usual reign?

 

Because I do not hope to know

The infirm glory of the positive hour

Because I do not think

Because I know I shall not know

The one veritable transitory power

Because I cannot drink

There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is nothing again  (1-15)

And further down we get these closing stanzas of the poem’s part 1:

 

Because these wings are no longer wings to fly

But merely vans to beat the air

The air which is now thoroughly small and dry

Smaller and dryer than the will

Teach us to care and not to care Teach us to sit still.

 

Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death

Pray for us now and at the hour of our death.  (34-40)

Wings that are “merely vans to beat the air”—ha!  That’s a reference Inferno’s Canto XXXIV where satan is a winged creature half stuck in ice beating his wings hopelessly in trying to fly.  How did I miss that in the past?  Ash Wednesday is about hope and hopelessness.  I’ve completely misread this poem.  I used to think Eliot was referring to Purgatorio.  The allusion is to Inferno.  Mary Sue is onto something!  I can’t wait to see what she writes.  ;)




Sunday, March 7, 2021

Dante’s Divine Comedy: Blog Links

Since Dante’s La Commedia is the most commented work on my blog, and since the number of posts on Dante Alighieri or his work amount to 56, I thought it worthwhile to have a post where they are collected and organized for user friendly linking.  So the following are links to all my posts on the Divine Comedy, organized by canticle and canto.

General posts on the overall work can be found here.

(1) TheDivine Comedy: Overview   

(2) Rod Dreher on Dante’s Divine Comedy 

(3) Dante Alighieri’s 750th Birthday 

(4) Literature in the News: Pope Frances Releases, Candor Lucis Aeternae


Inferno



Cantos I thru V

(1) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

Cantos VI thru XI

(1) Summary

(2) Commentary 

(3) Commentary, Dante’s Inferno, Canto VIII

XII thru XVII

(1) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

Cantos XVIII thru XXIII

(1) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

Cantos XXIV thru XXIX

(1) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

Cantos XXX thru XXXIV

(1) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

 

Purgatorio



Overall:

(1) Overview 

(2) Introduction 

(3) Structure & Ante Purgatory 

(4) Middle Section 

(5) Ending https://ashesfromburntroses.blogspot.com/2015/06/purgatorio-by-dante-alighieri-part-4.html   

Note: Posts 2, 3, 4, 5 were from a 2014-15 read.

Cantos I thru V

(1) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

(3) Notable Quote from Canto 2 

Cantos VI thru XI

(1) ) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

Cantos XII thru XVII

(1) ) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

Cantos XVIII thru XXIII

(1) ) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

Cantos XXIV thru XXVIII

(1) ) Summary 

(2) Commentary 

(3) On Arnaut Daniel 

Cantos XXIX thru XXXIII

(1) ) Summary 

(2) Commentary-1 

(3) Commentary-2 

(4) Commentary-3 


Paradiso



Overall:

(1) Introduction 

Cantos I thru V

(1) Summary 

(2) Comments 

Cantos VI thru IX

(1) Summary 

(2) Comments 

Cantos X thru XIV

(1) Summary 

(2) Comments 

Cantos XV thru XVIII

(1) Summary 

(2) Comments 

Cantos XIX thru XXII

(1)Summary 

(2) Comments 

Cantos XXIII thru XXVI

(1) Summary 

(2) Comments 

Cantos XXVII thru XXX

(1) Summary 

(2) Comments 

Cantos XXXI thru XXXIII

(1) Summary 

(2) Comment-1 

(3) Comment-2 

(4) Comment-3 

 


Sunday, March 11, 2018

Comments, Inferno, Cantos XXX thru XXXIV

Some random thoughts.  Ice is the final state for the worst sinners in Cocytus.  Why ice?  Flame is the sign of the Holy Spirit, and one burns with the love of God.  One is purged by fire in Purgatory.  The Holy Spirit descends at Pentecost as a breath of flame, but Satan in Cocytus whips up the winds that freeze as a frigid breath.  Ice freezes one into a final state, preserving the final state of the heart.  In physics, cold is the absence of heat, not really its own condition.  Dante could not have known that, but as it turns out evil is the absence of good, again not its own condition.  I think Dante would have been happy to make the analogy.

Back in Canto XXI, when the leader of the Malebranche blew a fart, I had said that Hollander pointed out that the critic Gian Roberto Saroli said the fart and the razzes by the other Malebranche were only musical notes in hell.  Well isn't the horn blast in XXXI by Nimrod a musical note?  Maybe Saroli meant the only musical notes in the Malebolge, not all of hell?  I don't know.  It seems to me the horn is a musical note.  It's not important.

The incoherence of Nimrod's unartful speech accentuates the theme of building the language and poetry that praises God.  Dante follows the belief that God created the beauty of language that got degenerated into a babel of tongues, and Nimrod is supposed to have been the legendary cause of it.

I'm not sure it was clear in the last Canto, but a time scheme is provided.  If you break through the hints, you can deduce two 24 hour periods between when Dante starts his journey back in Canto I and when he exits the underground of hell at the end of Canto XXXIV, but the perception of time is greatly distorted.  It takes 24 hours to go through all of hell, which is the thirty-three and a half cantos before they go into that crevice and 24 hours to walk through the underground in the second half of the last canto to reach the purgatory island.  How can they have gone through all of hell in 24 hours?  Dante is just as adept with time distortion as the modernist writers.

Dante's hell is portrayed as a funnel of concentric, descending circles.  But with all the ravenous eating that happens, especially here in the lower reaches (tenth bolge where the sinners rip into each other, Ugolino eating the brains of Ruggieri, Satan munching on Judas, Brutus, and Cassius, perhaps one can look at hell as a digestive tract.  Eating is definitely a motif here, and I think it's meant to be a parody of eating the body of Christ. 

Such mimic parody of sacred activities and ideas run throughout, as I have pointed out with the three sinners in Satan’s mouth as parodies of the three crucified at Golgotha.  Such parodies run throughout literature, but mostly in modern literature.  I can't think of another literary work prior to the modernist movement that relied on parodies of Christian theology.  Can anyone think of any?  Did Dante invent this?  I like to think of such parodies as the inverse of that which they parody. 

Irene was surprised that alongside Judas are two Romans from antiquity, Brutus and Cassius.  Yes, they are subordinate in importance to Judas Iscariot.  Remember Judas is in the middle and the region of hell, Judecca, is named after him, which is kind of odd since Brutus and Cassius died chronologically before Judas and would have been in hell before him.  But despite being ancillary to Judas, their importance is still paramount.  Remember the three themes that are overarching to the Comedia: man's relationship to God, man's relationship to society, and building the language that reflects the beauty of the Divine.  Brutus and Cassius assassinated the just lord of what would be the Roman Empire, and the Empire to Dante was the proper arrangement of society.  Ideally Dante probably would have wanted an evil poet who betrayed someone to be placed in one of Satan's mouths, and therefore represent each one of his overarching themes.  I guess there was no one, and so he doubled up with two Romans.

That Dante selected two Romans from antiquity is important for more reasons.  Throughout the Inferno you kept seeing characters from the classical world as well as those surely in Christendom.  Dante is knitting together the two worlds as complementary and continuous.  The early days of Christianity struggled with how to understand their classical roots, but ultimately they came to accept them.  Dante clearly does, but this is over a thousand years after the start of Christianity.  Personally I find the mythical characters incorporated rather hokey, one of my minor criticisms.  Though legendary characters such as Ulysses might have been real in Dante's mind, surely he knew the Minotaur wasn't real.  Hell is the only part of the Comedia he can use pagan world persons, so he does maximize interspersing them.  Remember one can only be saved if you're a noble Jew or a Christian, so classical world persons do not figure much in Purgatorio and Paradisio, though by hook and by crook Dante does sneak a few in. 

The Roman world was also important because it was through the Roman Empire that God spread Christianity.  If God had given Constantine a sign to conquer, then the integration of Christianity with the Roman Empire was divinely sanctioned.  So Brutus' and Cassius' assassination was an attempt to thwart the will of God that would have established the best of secular government possible.  To Dante, the Roman secular government was a check on the clergy and set up a rational organization of society.  If you look at the trend in the severity of sins - in increase of severity: sins of appetite, sins of heresy, sins of violence, the Malebolge which are sins of undermining society, sins of treachery - they represent a trend toward the greater dissolution of community.  The tenth bolge, that for counterfeiters where now it's not demons exacting punishment but other sinners on each other, shows Dante's view that the undermining of community is the greatest sin because it creates cynicism and doubts to its legitimacy.  Dante stresses, therefore, that the community takes precedence over the individual. 

Finally one last trend we see culminate in the last cantos is Dante's loss of pity for those in hell.  Remember at the beginning he had such compassion for Francesca and Ciacco in those early circles, but his sense of pity seems to attenuate as the journey progresses, and finally in these last cantos he is hardened and willing to exact justice himself.  He feels nothing for the suffering and the slapstick violence of those in the tenth bolge, no compassion or even contrition for the face he accidently (or divinely guided) kicks, no compassion for the traitor Bocca - indeed he tries to pull out his hair - no compassion, except for the children, for Ugolino's tragic story, and no compassion for Fra Alberigo, even reneging on a promise to him.  One can say that this loss of compassion for those in hell is the lesson that Dante the pilgrim learns as he goes on his journey.  Today we might be taken aback by that.  There are those today that pray for those in hell, and personally I think Christians should have compassion for all, even those undergoing eternal punishment.  But here's Dante's view.  Those in hell have come to God's divine justice, and to hope otherwise is to work against God's will. 

One other point I forgot to make.  As I said in my summary, being inverted while traveling out of hell is his imaginative understanding of what it means to pass from the northern hemisphere to the southern.  Notice when he passes what I think is the midpoint of Satan, he crossed the equator.  When the pilgrims come to the outside world again, they find themselves on the shores of an island, which they will discover when the sun comes out that it’s the island of purgatory.  Dante’s geology is interesting and will be further explained in the Purgatorio.  I’ve never completely understood it, but the critics say it makes sense.  Notice though, Dante in the early 1300’s knows the earth is round.  Don’t let people tell you that it was only with Columbus that people realized the earth was not flat.  It was known before hand.  The one thing Dante seems to get wrong I think is that he believes there is a 12 hour time difference between the northern and southern hemisphere.  Time differences work across longitudinal lines, not latitudinal lines.  There would be no time difference if Dante had just traveled due south on the same longitudinal line.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since the Ugolino scene, spanning Cantos XXXII and XXXIII, is so famous I should examine it in some detail.  The pilgrims have just left the traitorous Bocca behind when they stumble onto two souls locked together.

We had left him behind when I took note
of two souls so frozen in a single hole
the head of one served as the other's hat.  (XXXII. l. 124-6)

Describing Ugolino as Ruggieri’s cap is I think meant to be funny, though we will see it’s dark, ghastly humor.  The top man is gnawing on the brain of the bottom man, and Dante gets rather specific:

As a famished man will bite into his bread,
the one above had set his teeth into the other
just where the brain's stem leaves the spinal cord. (127-129)

Apparently Ugolino’s mouth is right at the base of the skull, just above the neck.  And Dante asks him, 'O you, who by so bestial a sign/show loathing for the one whom you devour,/tell me why’ (133-5).  The “bestial” significance is clearly emphasized and shows how when community breaks down man returns to a savage state.  It is also meant to recall the three beasts that were chasing Dante at the beginning of the Inferno in Canto I.  If one of the beasts had caught Dante, would he be in Ruggieri’s position?  We were never told what was the cause of Dante’s midlife crises.  Was it something as sinful as Ruggieri?  Probably not, nonetheless there is a parallel.  Side note: isn’t it stunning that a bishop, a man of religion, would be as cunning and viscious as Ruggieri? 

With skillful use of suspense, Dante holds off Ugolino’s response until the next canto.

He raised his mouth from his atrocious meal,
that sinner, and wiped it on the hair
of the very head he had been ravaging.

Then he began: 'You ask me to revive
the desperate grief that racks my heart
even in thought, before I tell it.

'But if my words shall be the seeds that bear
infamous fruit to the traitor I am gnawing,
then you will see me speak and weep together. (XXXIII.l. 1-9)

Hollander points out that Ugolino’s first words 'You ask me to revive/the desperate grief that racks my heart’ echo Aeneas’ words in The Aeneid when he is asked to tell the story of the fall of Troy and his escape from the burning city.  It is a memory most painful as he had witnessed the slaughter of his friends and relatives.  Ugolino too is dealing with a painful memory.  It’s interesting to contrast that Aeneas heroically saves his father and children at his horrific moment while Ugolino indirectly causes his children’s deaths.  Memory will be an important theme in Purgatorio in that we are presented with the problem of how do sinners who repent clean away a sinful memory, since memory is almost a reliving of that sin.  Ugolino’s punishment, and actually all the sinners in hell, includes the eternal memory of their sin.

Dante takes it for granted that his reader knows the Ugolino/Ruggieri story, which I outlined in my summary for this canto.  The two had colluded on a series of betrayals with ultimately Ruggieri betraying Ugolino by locking him and his children in a tower and starving them to death.  Ugolino’s story focuses on the starvation inside the tower.  First, before food was withheld, he tells how he had a premonition of his future, ‘when, in a dreadful dream,/the veil was rent, and I foresaw the future’ (26-7).  “The veil was rent” connects with the Christ’s crucifixion, the veil in the temple being split (Matt 27:51).  His dream is of a lord (standing for Ruggieri) hunting a wolf and wolfcubs (Ugolino and his children) with hounds, and the hounds ripping at the wolf’s flesh. 

Ugolino next turns to Dante and realizes Dante is unmoved by the story.

'You are cruel indeed, thinking what my heart
foretold, if you remain untouched by grief,
and if you weep not, what can make you weep? (40-2)

He is looking for pity it seems, and when he doesn’t receive any he ups the ante on his story.  He tells of when he wakes and at the hour he would normally have been fed, instead of food he heard the nailing shut of the door.  His reaction was of being stunned: 'I was so turned to stone inside I did not weep’ (49).  How should we take that?  A heart of stone tends to imply a lack of compassion.  He doesn’t weep but his children weep.  They don’t have a heart of stone.  Ugolino says that he gnawed his hands in sorrow, while the children thought he did it out of hunger.  Should we believe him?  Many of the souls encountered in Inferno have not been completely straight with the truth.  The children offer themselves for food.  He doesn’t offer himself as food for them.  Is there a selfish motive here for not telling the full truth?  I suspect so. 

Ugolino goes on to tell on how one by one his children died in front of him.  And he concludes his story, the bodies of his children in front of him, with enigmatic line, “Then fasting had more power than grief” (75).  Are we to read it as because of his grief he was able to fast from eating his children, or the hunger from not having eaten overwhelmed his grief and he ate his children to survive as long as possible?  Hollander goes on to explain both readings have at various times been in vogue, and that the historical evidence probably, though not conclusively, showed he did not eat his children.  However, this is a work of fiction, and Dante has at times altered history for his use.  But it’s unclear if Dante even knew the reality; tales have a way acclimating barnacles.  Look at the very next lines.

Having said this, with maddened eyes he seized
that wretched skull again between his teeth
and clenched them on the bone just like a dog. (76-8)


Ugolino seized with rage returns to gnawing on Ruggieri.  The memory of gnawing on his children is what I think overwhelms him.  And the cannibalism on Ruggieri becomes poetic justice as eternal punishment.  And the feeding upon other human beings is an ongoing motif in these latter cantos.  Why would Dante not go as far with it as possible?  I believe Ugolino did eat the bodies of his children, until he too died.

With that I conclude this survey of Dante’s Inferno.  I hope you got something out of it.  The book club will be taking up Purgatorio in a few months, probably around June.  Currently we are reading G. K. Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man.  I should have a few posts on that, but come and join the Catholic Thought Book Club at Goodreads.  It’s free and filled with good discussion.