Two weeks ago we had a Gospel passage where
in a storm at sea, Jesus admonishes his apostles for not having faith, and yet
performs the miracle of quieting the storm,In last week’s reading Jesus praises Jarius and the woman with the
hemorrhage for having faith, and He performs two miracles.In today’s reading, Jesus returns to His home
town, preaches, and yet the people who knew Him best took offense at Him.Here was a great lack of faith, and so He
performed no miracles.Faith is critical
to these early chapters of Mark.
Jesus departed from there and came to his native place, accompanied
by his disciples.
When the sabbath
came he began to teach in the synagogue,
and many who heard
him were astonished.
They said, “Where
did this man get all this?
What kind of wisdom
has been given him?
What mighty deeds
are wrought by his hands!
Is he not the
carpenter, the son of Mary,
and the brother of
James and Joses and Judas and Simon?
And are not his
sisters here with us?”
And they took
offense at him.
Jesus said to them,
“A prophet is not
without honor except in his native place
and among his own
kin and in his own house.”
So he was not able
to perform any mighty deed there,
apart from curing a
few sick people by laying his hands on them.
He was amazed at
their lack of faith.
~Mk:1-6
Why did the people
who knew Him best spurn Him?Fr. Joseph
Mary of the Capuchin Franciscans explains it fully and provides the
significance for our spiritual needs.
God is all around us, but it is so ordinary
that the familiarity breeds contempt.
Sunday Meditation: “Where did this
man get all this?”
Back to a John
Michael Talbot hymn, “Where Have You Hidden.”
We are now fully back in Ordinary Time, and
the Gospel reading picks where we left Jesus before Lent and Easter entered the
liturgical season. Jesus had been
preaching in Galilee with His disciples and now this Sunday returns home. This passage is an example of what some
scholars call a Markan Sandwich, that is, a technique that Mark likes to use in
telling a story. A Markan Sandwich is
one where Mark starts with one story, transitions to another, and then returns—thereby
creating the sandwich—to complete the original story.
Jesus
came home with his disciples.
Again
the crowd gathered,
making
it impossible for them even to eat.
When
his relatives heard of this they set out to seize him,
for
they said, "He is out of his mind."
The
scribes who had come from Jerusalem said,
"He
is possessed by Beelzebul,"
and
"By the prince of demons he drives out demons."
Summoning
them, he began to speak to them in parables,
"How
can Satan drive out Satan?
If a
kingdom is divided against itself,
that
kingdom cannot stand.
And
if a house is divided against itself,
that
house will not be able to stand.
And
if Satan has risen up against himself
and
is divided, he cannot stand;
that
is the end of him.
But no one can enter a strong
man's house to plunder his property
unless
he first ties up the strong man.
Then
he can plunder the house.
Amen,
I say to you,
all
sins and all blasphemies that people utter will be
forgiven
them.
But
whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit
will
never have forgiveness,
but
is guilty of an everlasting sin."
For
they had said, "He has an unclean spirit."
His
mother and his brothers arrived.
Standing
outside they sent word to him and called him.
A crowd
seated around him told him,
"Your
mother and your brothers and your sisters
are
outside asking for you."
But
he said to them in reply,
"Who
are my mother and my brothers?"
And
looking around at those seated in the circle he said,
"Here
are my mother and my brothers.
For
whoever does the will of God
is my
brother and sister and mother."
~Mk 3:20-35
So the first story is
that of Jesus’ family thinking He’s gone insane. The middle part of the story is the conflict
with the Scribes and His answers to their claims. And finally He returns to conclude with a
resolution to the first story.
Fr, Joseph Mary of
the Capuchin Franciscans offers a pertinent homily.
Now some may be shocked
by the verse about the unforgivable sin.
Jesus says, “But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never
have forgiveness, but is guilty of an everlasting sin.” What is this unforgivable sin, because I want
to make sure I never commit it? An old
favorite of mine, Fr. John Corapi explains, taken from St. Augustine I might
add.
Got that? The unforgivable sin is refusing final repentance.
Sunday Meditation: “For whoever does
the will of God is my brother and sister and mother.”
Let’s end with a hymn
from John Michael Talbot, “One Faith.”
Easter has passed and we like the apostles
are dazed with the events of the past week.Jesus has died, and some have seen the Risen Man.But we hide in fear and doubt.Until suddenly He appears with the word of
Peace.
We are now in the Easter season, and we come
to the Second Sunday of Easter, the first being Easter itself.The reading is the same for all three years
of the lectionary.We are asked to
believe.
On the evening of that first day
of the week,
when the doors were locked, where
the disciples were,
for fear of the Jews,
Jesus came and stood in their
midst
and said to them, "Peace be
with you."
When he had said this, he showed
them his hands and his side.
The disciples rejoiced when they
saw the Lord.
Jesus said to them again,
"Peace be with you.
As the Father has sent me, so I
send you."
And when he had said this, he
breathed on them and said to them,
"Receive the Holy Spirit.
Whose sins you forgive are
forgiven them,
and whose sins you retain are
retained."
Thomas, called Didymus, one of the
Twelve,
was not with them when Jesus came.
So the other disciples said to
him, "We have seen the Lord."
But he said to them,
"Unless I see the mark of the
nails in his hands
and put my finger into the
nailmarks
and put my hand into his side, I
will not believe."
Now a week later his disciples
were again inside
and Thomas was with them.
Jesus came, although the doors
were locked,
and stood in their midst and said,
"Peace be with you."
Then he said to Thomas, "Put
your finger here and see my hands,
and bring your hand and put it
into my side,
and do not be unbelieving, but
believe."
Thomas answered and said to him,
"My Lord and my God!"
Jesus said to him, "Have you
come to believe because you have seen me?
Blessed are those who have not
seen and have believed."
Now Jesus did many other signs in
the presence of his disciples
that are not written in this book.
But these are written that you may
come to believe
that Jesus is the Christ, the Son
of God,
and that through this belief you
may have life in his name.
~Jn
20:19-31
In the year 2000, the Second Sunday of Easter
has been observed as the Feast of Divine Mercy, authorized by Pope John Paul II, who had a devotion to St. Maria Faustina.Fr. Joseph Mary of the Capuchins Franciscan gives
a wonderful homily, capturing the fear and message of peace of the day.
I bet no one in the
whole world has used Orwell's 1984 as
part of a Divine Mercy Sunday homily.Well done!And that is the connection
to “Peace” or “Shalom,” or as Father explains, “Wholeness.”Christ brings wholeness to a fragmented
world.
Sunday Meditation: "Peace be with
you."
Finally, I embedded Annie Karto’s “Divine
Mercy Flood My Soul” some 11 years ago for Divine Mercy Sunday.I love it so I will post it again, only a
different video with the lyrics.
After Jesus is baptized (see last week’s
Gospel) by John the Baptist, John’s fortunes “decrease” while Jesus’s begins
His ministry.Today, in gathering some
of His disciples, He announces the Kingdom of God.
After
John had been arrested,
Jesus
came to Galilee proclaiming the gospel of God:
"This
is the time of fulfillment.
The
kingdom of God is at hand.
Repent,
and believe in the gospel."
As he
passed by the Sea of Galilee,
he saw Simon and his brother
Andrew casting their nets into the sea;
they
were fishermen.
Jesus
said to them,
"Come
after me, and I will make you fishers of men."
Then
they abandoned their nets and followed him.
He
walked along a little farther
and
saw James, the son of Zebedee, and his brother John.
They
too were in a boat mending their nets.
Then
he called them.
So
they left their father Zebedee in the boat
along
with the hired men and followed him.
~Mk
1:14-20
This week Fr. Joseph Mary of the Capuchin
Franciscans makes you feel the full force of Christ’s call to repent. .
Fr. Joseph Mary does not seem like an
introvert to me, but that may be deceptive.I had no idea what menudo is.I
never had it.I looked it up and
yuck.We never do hear how that young
man resolved his anger that evening.Do
you think that young man repented?My
intuition tells me he did.
Meditation: "This is the
time of fulfillment.The kingdom of God
is at hand.Repent, and believe in the
gospel."
Today’s Gospel is one of those unforgettable
parables—that of the rich man and Lazerus—that convicts.It convicted me from the first time I read
it, and it continues to every time I read it.Is it because I identify with the rich man?What exactly is his sin?Sure luxury and gluttony, but neither are
listed in the Ten Commandments.However,
luxury and gluttony lead to the obliviousness and callousness of the rich man
to the pitiful poor man.But there is so
much more to the parable than showing the just deserts of heaven.The Kingdom of God is the paradoxical
inversion of the earthly world.There is
also the lesson Father Abraham, a stand in for God, delivers: no sign from
heaven will ever be good enough for those without faith.
Jesus
said to the Pharisees:
"There
was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen
and
dined sumptuously each day.
And
lying at his door was a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores,
who
would gladly have eaten his fill of the scraps
that
fell from the rich man's table.
Dogs
even used to come and lick his sores.
When
the poor man died,
he
was carried away by angels to the bosom of Abraham.
The
rich man also died and was buried,
and
from the netherworld, where he was in torment,
he
raised his eyes and saw Abraham far off
and
Lazarus at his side.
And
he cried out, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me.
Send
Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue,
for I
am suffering torment in these flames.'
Abraham
replied,
'My
child, remember that you received
what
was good during your lifetime
while
Lazarus likewise received what was bad;
but
now he is comforted here, whereas you are tormented.
Moreover,
between us and you a great chasm is established
to
prevent anyone from crossing who might wish to go
from
our side to yours or from your side to ours.'
He
said, 'Then I beg you, father,
send
him to my father's house, for I have five brothers,
so
that he may warn them,
lest
they too come to this place of torment.'
But
Abraham replied, 'They have Moses and the prophets.
Let
them listen to them.'
He
said, 'Oh no, father Abraham,
but
if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.'
Then
Abraham said, 'If they will not listen to Moses and the prophets,
neither
will they be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead.'"
Lk
16:19-31
As well as I thought I knew this parable,
this Franciscan friar—Fr. Joseph Mary from the Capuchin Friars on a vlog called
A Simple Word—points out even more
than I realized.
The parable is addressed to the Pharisees!How could I miss that?And perhaps even more importantly, the rich
man has no name while Lazarus does.How
rich is that!
###
Edit 25 September 2022 at 9:05 PM:
Here’s an interesting question on this
parable, proposed by Fr. Paul D. Scalia (yes, the son of the former Supreme
Court Justice, Antonin Scalia) in an article, “The Poverty of Wealth,” at The Catholic Thing.
Who is the more pitiable in this parable, Dives (the rich man) or
Lazarus? Naturally, our heart goes out to Lazarus, the poor man at the gate,
longing for scraps of food and whose sores the dogs would come and lick (an
endearing detail to today’s dog lovers; but not to the ancient Jews, who didn’t
have that same affection). In fact, Dives is the more to be pitied, not only
because it’s far worse to do evil than to suffer it, but also because of what
he became by way of his sin. So, we must appreciate the wretched state of Dives
and the sin that brought him to it.
I think the person to be pitied becomes inverted
with the inversion of status in God’s kingdom.I think this is a very pertinent question to ask.