"Love follows knowledge."
"Beauty above all beauty!"
– St. Catherine of Siena

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Short Story Analysis: “Wilde in Omaha” by Ron Hansen


I had written this up a number of months ago after reading the story, but I forgot to actually post it.  I think you will like this.  It’s a really good story.

This is a really outstanding story, “Wilde in Omaha,” and the second outstanding work by Ron Hansen I have read this year.  I’m not sure why, but you can actually read this online here

The story is based on Oscar Wilde’s first trip through America back in 1882, and Ron Hansen imagines a stop in Omaha, Nebraska.  Wilde really did have two American trips, the first lasting almost a year started in New York City and ended in San Francisco.  So the story can be classified as historical fiction.  You can read extensively about Wilde’s trip to the United States here and of his itinerary here.  


The story is told in first person from Robert Murphy, a journalist who spent the day with Wilde on that stop in Omaha.  Wilde dubs him “Bobby” because Murphy introduces himself as Robert but everyone calls him “Bob.”  So here at the beginning we already see Wilde’s character as striving to break conventionality, striving to be different, embellishing when others accept the hum drum.  The story captures the tension between an aesthetic that strives for individuality and that strives for journalistic precision, between imaginative embellishment and “the tyranny of facts.”

The story has a preface which initiates the first person narrative.  Murphy hears of Oscar Wilde’s death at the age of 46, which historically occurred in year 1900.   The sorrow of that news event spurs Murphy to tell of the day, March 21st, 1882, a Tuesday, the day Oscar Wilde came to Omaha as a literary celebrity as part of his speaking tour, and where Murphy was privileged to interview and accompany him.  In some ways it was the highlight of Murphy’s life.

The plot is relatively simple.  At sunup of that day, Murphy meets Wilde at his hotel in Sioux City, they take a train to Council Bluffs where they switch to a train for Omaha, all the while Murphy interviewing Wilde and jotting down note after note.  In Omaha they are met by the city’s elite, “the peasantry of the west” as Wilde calls them, and is taken to the finest hotel, the Whitnell House.  There he is given a grand luncheon where he is asked to read one of his poems.  He chooses a sonnet, “The Grave of Keats,” an ode to the poet John Keats, and written in a sort of Keatsian style.  That evening he gives his lecture at the Boyd Opera House to the paying crowd, the subject being “The Decorative Arts,” the importance of beauty in life of a community.  That evening, instead of going back to his hotel with the entourage, he escapes with Murphy to Murphy’s apartment, where the two share a few drinks of Scotch whisky and where they exchange some honest conversation.  Wilde then stumbles his way back to his hotel room to move on the next day.

Before I get to the theme of the story, I want to speak about the execution.  The danger of portraying a historical figure, especially one with a distinct personality is that on one extreme the author might not capture the personality and on the other extreme might delineate him as a caricature and cliché.  I found Ron Hansen captured Oscar Wilde perfectly, threading the needle between the two extremes.  On the train to Omaha, sitting in a compartment reading newspapers, Murphy asks Wilde about appreciating good reporting.

"Don't you appreciate some occasional accuracy in reporting?"

"It's simply that one can't escape the tyranny of facts. One can scarcely open a newspaper without learning something useful about the sordid crimes against green grocers or a dozen disgusting details relating to the consumption of pork. On the other hand, I do like hearing myself talk. It is one of my greatest pleasures." Our railway car jerked forward into a screaking roll and Wilde looked outside. Watching soot-blackened shanties slide past, he said, "I find railway travel the most tedious experience in life. That is, if one excepts being sung to in Albert Hall, or dining with a chemist."

I sallied forth recklessly by asking, "Was this outre persona of yours concocted at Oxford or earlier?"

Wilde forgot himself momentarily and grinned with buck teeth of a smoker's yellow hue. And then he superimposed his mask again. "I behave as I have always behaved--dreadfully. And that is why people adore me." After a little reflection, he added, "Besides, to be authentically natural is a difficult pose to keep up."

Murphy’s piercing question shocks Wilde out of his persona, and for a moment we get the unpretentious Wilde.  This unpretentious Wilde will be more prominent at the last scene when the two go back to Murphy’s apartment and drink whisky.  So Hansen captures this subtle dance where Wilde jumps in and out of his pretentious persona.  Here is Wilde putting on a show at the “grand luncheon.”

Soon after that Wilde shouted "Howdy, pardnuhs!" from the mezzanine and heard a smattering of welcoming applause that dissipated as he descended the staircase in a halting, mincing, queenly way, his mane of dark hair still tangled and wet from his bath, a lily held to his nose as his other hand squeaked in its slide along the brass balustrade. Clothed now in his valet's high-button shoes, a charcoal bow tie, and a Wall Street sort of dull gray suit whose color, he was to insist, was that of "moonlight gleaming on Lake Erie," Wilde was taunting Omaha's virility by treating their accustomed business attire as the most droll of his fanciful costumes.

I scowled at his cheekiness, certain that his teasing strategy of affront and parry would not serve him with this frontier audience, and, I confess, half wishing that some man of importance would dress him down for his impudence. But most of the invitees had already entered the dining room, and the others so desperately wanted the afternoon to meet with the aesthete's approbation that they overlooked his ridicule.

We were seated at a dais in the dining room, I on his right hand by dint of my newspaper assignment and Reverend Doherty from County Cavan on his left by dint of his blessing before the meal and his introductory remarks about their very talented guest from across the water. Three minutes into it, Wilde interrupted the Irishman by shouting, "You are so evidently, so unmistakably sincere, and worst of all truthful, that I cannot believe a word you say!"

Though many laughed, Reverend Doherty did not immediately get the joke and flushed with apology as he explained that he'd gotten all the information on Wilde from eastern newspapers.

Wilde replied, "It is a sure sign that newspapers have degenerated when they can be relied upon."

Adopting the pretense that I was deaf Wilde spoke so loudly throughout the luncheon that even the kitchen help could hear him, and he continually gave uncensored expression to whatever entered his mind. A Cornish hen was served to him and he held his head as he whined, "Oh why are they always giving me these pedestrians to eat?" A Merlot from California was poured and he hesitated before trying the American vintage. But after he sipped it, he thought "the hooch" quite good. "I have learnt to be cautious," he explained. "The English have a miraculous power to turn wine into water."

Now that is Wilde putting on a show.  Because Hansen has let Murphy see the unvarnished Wilde, when Wilde is on show we sense the pretentiousness of his act, and therefore the reader sees the character as three dimensional and not a cliché.  And yet the reader is entertained by the entertaining Wilde.

If I were to articulate the theme of the story, and mind you this may only be my perception, it would be that aestheticism, at least in the Wilde variety, deludes the author, or whoever immerses himself into it, from reality.  Wilde tries to operate in a Romanticized worldview, but in that state he is doomed to fail—of which his early death demonstrates—and his artistry suffers.  His poem that he reads at the luncheon, “The Grave of Keats,” is absolutely horrible.  Murphy points this out by saying it resembles “a schoolboy’s plagiarism.”  But Wilde pretends to be faint from its artistry and elaborates that he “thought of Keats as of a priest of beauty slain before his time.” 

What we see is that Wilde’s aesthetics amount to embellishments on the mundane, just as his paradoxical quips embellish the “authentically natural.” The authentically natural is not enough.  One has to decorate life, and that is the subject of his lecture. 

Squaring his pages, Wilde commenced by announcing his subject as "The Decorative Arts." And then he read: "In my lecture tonight I do not wish to give you any abstract definition of beauty; you can get along very well without philosophy if you surround yourself with beautiful things; but I wish to tell you of what we have done and are doing in England to search out those men and women who have knowledge and power of design, of the schools of art provided for them, and the noble use we are making of art in the improvement of the handicraft of our country."

So that’s the profound depth of his thought, to “surround yourself with beautiful things?”  It seems rather empty, even shallow, and Murphy points this out. 

House decoration, for gosh sakes! The topic was not especially inert, nor his overly inflected and cautious presentation necessarily stupefying, but his lecture was so much less clever and pungent than his amusingly insulting conversation that I wanted to shout out to the simulacrum, "Stop, Oscar! This is not you!" And then I was forced to confront the urgency of my dyspepsia. Was I afraid that he seemed foolish, or that I did? That he seemed dull, or that my high hopes of enterprise and wealth in Omaha had descended into simply holding a job? This is not you and its hundred variations had afflicted me often since this daredevil tyro made the three-week journey west to the rich possibilities of Nebraska, but there was no This is you as its complement. Amid my hearty and prosperous cohort, I felt like a poseur.

That paragraph is perhaps at the core of the story’s theme, and it’s a bit complex.  Murphy is undergoing a double epiphany.  First he realizes that Wilde is performing for the audience as a job.  His lecture tour amounted to a shallowness of ideas to make money, “simply holding a job.”  And then in retrospect he realizes that he too had deluded himself to the “rich possibilities” that he might have as a writer.  He too as a journalist was “simply holding a job.”  Reality undermines Romanticized dreams. 

And so, at the climax of the story, when Murphy and Wilde are drinking Scotch at Murphy’s apartment, an honest moment transpires.

 I am abashed to admit that I felt so adrift in our colloquy I could only find the craft to top off my shot glass with whisky.

Seeing me, Wilde drank and held out his shot glass again. I indulged him. Wilde said, "I find it perfectly monstrous the way people go about nowadays, saying things behind one's back that are absolutely and entirely true."

The whisky has brought the two to a sober moment.  Murphy then will get to a hard, cold realistic fact of Wilde’s art.

We listened to the floor clock ticking in the quietude. Waiting for me to say something was an agony for him. So it was with a sense of emergency that I finally risked, "Would you mind an impertinence?"

Wilde softly rested an inquisitive gaze upon me.

"It's my stab at some good advice."

"It is always a silly thing to give advice, but to give good advice is absolutely fatal."

But I perdured. "Don't give all these lectures," I said. "Don't let audiences feed on you like this. They'll lay waste to your talent. And don't dissemble. Even poetry is wrong for you. It feels trumped up. With your fluency and flair for humor it's far better you concentrate on fiction and plays."

At first Wilde seemed shocked and disturbed by my outburst, but then he smiled wryly and sat up and shook his hair free of his face. "What excellent whisky!" he said. "And how perfectly splendid of you to accompany me through this wonderfully exciting day. This is the first pleasant throb of joy I have had since Mr. Vail last took sick."

Reality requires an artist to know what he is good at.  To live in a Romanticized delusion inhibits one’s art.  Murphy’s hard advice was prophetic.  Oscar Wilde is not known for his poetry.  He will go on to write some good fiction and some really outstanding plays, and they will be rich in humor, not Romanticized melancholy.  Read Wilde’s play The Importance of Being Earnest to appreciate his humor and dramaturgy. 

Ron Hansen’s “Wilde in Omaha” is a really fine story. 



No comments:

Post a Comment