First, it was an incredible surprise on the timing. Not much more than a couple of hours (maybe
it wasn’t even that long) before the white smoke I had just finished reading a
blog by a church historian on how long some of these conclaves take to come to
a decision. He was implying to not hold
your breath. Well, he was wrong.
I was also surprised on who was picked. I had been researching the leading
candidates, and I had settled on a few who I thought would be good picks:
Cardinal Erdő from Hungary,
Ouellet from Canada, Tagle from the Philippines, or even possibly Dolan from
here in New York. Everyone was looking
at candidates seventy or younger. Bergoglio
was never mentioned as a leading candidate.
He seemed to have come out of nowhere, though it’s now been mentioned he
was a runner-up when Benedict XVI was elected in 2005. It was while sitting at my desk at work that I
saw a headline come across of the white smoke from the Sistine Chapel, and
therefore a Pope was selected. I
switched on some video feed from the Vatican and I waited in anticipation like
the rest of the world as to who the man was.
Suddenly my boss comes into my office and we start talking work. He couldn’t see my computer screen and it was
muted, so he didn’t know what was going on.
After we finished talking I told him that they had selected a Pope and I
was waiting to see who it was. He was
interested. He’s Catholic too, though
somewhat cynical, and he came over and had me put the sound up. We waited for a bit, and another person,
another Catholic , came in and we three, me in my chair, the other two standing
behind me, stared at the screen until the new Pontiff came out. What a surprise that the man selected, Jorge
Mario Bergoglio from Argentina, was 76 and he took the name of Francis.
First let me state some less profound, more emotional
connections to the man. He’s from this
side of the world! Who needs the Europeans! That’s tongue-in-cheek but it’s fantastic
that the Pope comes from the New World side of the Atlantic. I probably would have been just as excited if
he had come from Africa or Asia, though from the Americas is just a touch more
special. Christopher Columbus and
Amerigo Vespucci must have prayed a few extra Ave Marias for this to come
about. ;) Next, he’s from Italian
immigrants. I can certainly identify
with that! In fact his middle name is
the same as my father’s first. His
father was a railway worker, the same with my great grandfather. Before he went into religious life the Holy
Father was either a chemist or a chemical engineer (I’ve seen both and can’t
verify which), earning a master’s degree, and after becoming a Jesuit went on
to teach among other things literature.
Hmm, an engineer (or a science background) with links to
literature? There’s only one person I
know with that combination, and I identify with him extremely well. :p Finally
he takes the name of Francis, after Francis of Assisi, which I have always
considered to be my personal patron saint since before pre-teen when I took the
name as my confirmation name in his honor.
Another interesting fact is that he’s a Jesuit, a religious
order, and it’s very rare for a Pope to be from one, and he’s the first from
the Jesuits. The Jesuits are one of the
intellectual arms of the Catholic Church, but the Jesuits have more of an
evangelical bent than the others, and I think that’s significant. They don’t just teach; they persuade with
rhetorical skill. Poet Gerard Manly
Hopkins was a Jesuit priest and James Joyce was Jesuit trained. Given the slow secularization across western
culture, the Cardinals picked a man trained to deliver sharp, disciplined
argument. I also think this is in
contrast to his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.
B16 was known as a deep, profound theologian, arguably the leading
theologian of this age, even before he became Pope. Wikipedia lists 66 books under his name from
before and during his Papacy. But B16 presented
arguments as a scholar and, if you will, as an artist: full context, intricate
logic, subtle connections, and rounded in a sort of beauty. While that might be good for the intellectual
believer, and I certainly grew to love the man through his incredible
illuminations, I don’t think the non-believer, or the lapsed Catholic, or even
average person in the pew really contended with his thought. Jesuit persuasion is more of a
disputation. It’s not artistic. Its thought is honed to clarity and it
responds to the rebuttal by picking apart its fallacies. This will be more of an engaged counter to
the philosophical Zeitgeist of our day. And
I can it see already. On that first day
on the balcony, he was radiating Francis of Assisi, simple and humble. But on the second day, he gave a homily reflecting
his Jesuit mind in his first mass as Pope, and I caught it. The homily given was completely
extemporaneous, no notes, no teleprompter, completely off the top of his head,
in, mind you, his second language of Italian.
But when you look at the translated transcript what you see is a central
thesis that links the three biblical readings; then boom-boom-boom, three
points that flesh out and substantiate the argument, and then builds toward a
higher point from where he started, all in about eight paragraphs. Now that’s a trained mind.
The fact that he took the name Francis after St. Francis of
Assisi is most significant. No Pope has
ever done that. It’s dramatic, stunning
actually, especially when you realize that Francis of Assisi wasn’t even a
priest but a deacon. That may be a first
in itself too. What does the connection
to Francis of Assisi signify? Several
things actually. First simplicity. St. Francis was known as a most simple soul, a
“fool for Christ,” living in the most rudimentary lodging, begging for meals,
working only for a day’s wage, never saving any money, giving anything left
over away. He eschewed planning,
organizing, systematizing. The Friars
Minor still try to live that way, though I don’t know how. (By the way, when I say above that I consider
St. F of A as my personal patron saint it’s not because I’m of the same
constitution; quite the contrary, he’s my opposite, and in order to be grounded
I need to embrace him as counter ballast.)
Second, St. Francis embraced and actually loved poverty, both his own poverty
and those who lived in it. Pope Francis
in his constant reference to the poor since the moment of his selection and in
every public moment since seems to be completely focused on this. While this is nothing new for the Catholic
Church, which happens to be the largest charitable organization in the world
(hospitals, orphanages, homeless, destitute, developing countries, natural
catastrophes, etc.), the impression the general public has is of opulence. Well, 1.2 billion Catholics each donating a
little something adds up to several billion dollars. I think he wants the image to reflect the
Church’s spirit of poverty. Third, the
Franciscans, unlike the previous religious orders, were a city ministry, and
quite the opposite of the monastic orders.
Monastics withdrew from the world into monasteries in the isolated
countryside. Franciscans, formed in the
high middle ages with the resurgence of cities, engaged people’s needs on a
street level, caring for the destitute and evangelizing on a personal
level. It’s most telling that the previous
pope took his papal name from the most famous of the monastic’s, St. Benedict,
while this pope stands in stark contrast.
Finally, the significance of the name Francis for this Holy Father is
the link to the charge Christ Himself
directed St. Francis at a ruined chapel outside of Assisi named San
Damiano. “Francis, can’t you see my
house is crumbling. Go and rebuild the
church.” And so the saint is a known
also as the mender of the church, and certainly there is some mending to be
done in the current church.
We have these two strands in this pope, the disciplined mind
of a scholarly Jesuit with the humility, simplicity, and human engagement of
the Franciscan ministry. The implication
is that he’s going to challenge the spiritually indifferent trend of western
culture, both through rhetorical argumentation and humble example. And in him we see the real deal. He is inherently a humble man, lived in a
small apartment, cooked his own meals, rode the subway, embraced the people in
the slums. St. Francis embraced and
kissed the lepers; Bergoglio washed and kissed the feet of today’s equivalent
of the lepers, AIDs patients. On Holy
Thursdays Catholic religious wash the feet of lay people in reminiscence of
Christ washing His disciple’s feet (John, chpt 13). And at another Holy Thursday Bergoglio washed
the feet of pregnant women to highlight the unborn, the truly least of
humanity. (Christ: “Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for
one of these least ones, you did not do for me.” Mat, 25:45)
The unborn, the lowest caste of the secularized world, are so least of
humanity that they can’t speak out, they can’t resist power, they can’t even
show you their face to activate some element of compassion; compassion has to
be there a priori. It will be the Holy Father’s mission to validate
that compassion resides somewhere in every human heart, and connect it to our
everlasting God. So far I am impressed
with the selection. This seems to be an
inspired pick. May God bless his words
and deeds.
The Lord wants us like Him: with an open heart, roaming the streets of
Buenos Aires. He wants us walking the streets of Buenos Aires and carrying His
message! Like Him, on the road and on the street. He doesn’t want us hoarding His word just for
ourselves, locked inside our own hearts, our own house, or in the temple,
instead that we spill His word on the street. He wants us walking out on
the street.
Manny I'm not sure about this but I don't think St Benedict was ordained either, although he is largely considered the father of monastic life. (Actually, St Augustine had him beat by a few centuries, but I'll let the Augustinians and the Benedictines hash that one out). I too am enthralled with Pope Francis and I urge everyone to continue to pray for him and our Church. Already, people are behaving badly about his papacy. We must not do the devil's bidding for him to divide our Church any further.
ReplyDeleteBlessings
Joyce
You might be right about St. Benedict not being ordained. I just can't seem to find anything that would confirm it one way or the other. Absolutely we should not do anything that would divide the church. I hardly ever comment on any disagreement I may have with some issue or other. There's plenty of people who want division, and I don't want to be any part of that.
DeleteExcellent reflections Manny.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Manny. You certainly have quite a connection with our new pope!
ReplyDeleteI concur with Joyce, and am saddened by all the ugliness. This before the man is even situated!
I am always astonished by the extent that people form opinions on outward things and brief impressions. It happened to Benedict, it happens all the time with Obama, (hence his presidency,) and now with Pope Francis. sigh. How can so many be so shallow?
People have things in their heads they want confirmed and will make them so, one way or the other. Thanks Kelly.
Delete