"Love follows knowledge."
"Beauty above all beauty!"
– St. Catherine of Siena

Showing posts with label St. Paul of Tarsus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label St. Paul of Tarsus. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

Quo Vadis: A Narrative of the Time of Nero by Henryk Sienkiewicz, Part 10

This is the tenth post of Henryk Sienkiewicz’s historical novel, Quo Vadis.

You can find Post #1 here.  

Post #2 here. 

Post #3 here.  

Post #4 here. 

Post #5 here. 

Post #6 here.  

Post #7 here. 

Post #8 here. 

Post #9 here.   


 

Chapters 64 thru 71

Summary

One evening a Senator, Scevinus, visits Petronius and openly talks of the dissatisfaction in the Roman people over Nero, and of the potential of overthrowing the emperor.  Petronius warns him about such talk.  Scevinus tells him that the next day will be the last of the Christians to be slaughtered in the games.  Petronius realizes this could be the end of Lygia and decides to make one last effort on Nero.  That night at Nero’s feast, Petronius tells Nero that he will celebrate a wedding feast, the wedding of Lygia and Vinicius which the emperor himself had given permission.  Nero is a little surprised at this, but Tigellinus tells Nero she is still in prison on Nero’s command.  Nero plays along and says they will celebrate the wedding after the last of the games.

The Roman people, tired of the blood sport, still populate the theater knowing they will be coming to an end.  Everyone expects the death of the beautiful Lygia, but they do not know how she would be slaughtered.  Vinicuis, reconciled to her death, comes to perhaps see her one last time, but in his soul he rages for revenge against Nero and hopes for a miracle.  The spectacle begins with Ursus entering into the arena, and everyone marvels at the giant they had heard about.  Hoping to be crucified, Ursus stands in the middle of the arena looking at the crowd, then dropping to his knees to pray.  The crowd howls with disappointment.  The want to see him fight.  Then the trumpets blast and a bull is let into the arena with the unconscious body of Lygia strapped to the bull’s horns.  The crowd gasps, and Ursus in a rush runs to the bull and grabs him by the horns. The bull and the giant lock in a battle of strength, the bull trying to gore Ursus, Ursus trying to twist the bull’s neck.  The amphitheater is in an amazed silence as they watch the deadlock between the man and the beast, neither of the two pushing the other back, both straining to the limit of their strength.  When Ursus’s muscles are ready to yield, the bull’s neck slowly twists until his neck breaks and he dies.  The amphitheater is finally able to breath and then goes wild.  Ursus unties Lygia and carrying her still unconscious body to the podium in front of Nero begs mercy for her.  The crowd, clearly endeared to Ursus, roars and gives the sign for mercy.  Vinicius jumps into the arena and goes beside Ursus and Lygia and shows the scars on his body fighting for Roman wars.  Tigellinus tells Nero to have them slain.  Nero wants to have them slaughtered but becomes afraid of the vociferous crowd, and relents.

Lygia, still unconscious, is taken to Petronius’s house with Vinicius praising God the whole way.  A physician who was dispatched declares that once the fever passes, Lygia should recover.  That night Lygia’s consciousness returns for a moment and then falls back into a sleep.  Vinicius kneels by her all night long in prayer.

Petronius, wanting to find out if there were any further schemes from the palace, goes to visit Nero.  Nero, angry at how the events had turned, does not wish to speak to Petronius, but Petronius tells him to write a poem on the magnanimity of the emperor toward a young maiden.  Nero is pleased with the suggestion and plans to use the subject to glorify himself.  Still when he returns home advises Vinbicius to take Lygia to Sicily.  Vinicius agrees but plans to take her to Pomponia as she recovers.  Vinicius feels an immense happiness.

Christians from across the Rome visit Lygia at Petronius’s home.  The apostle Peter stops by one night.  Vinicius thanks him for all the prayers which led to Lygia’s being saved.  Peter tells him that he expects to be a victim of Nero’s continuing persecutions.  Vinicius implores him to leave Rome and save himself.  But Peter tells Vinicius how the Lord had predicted one day he would be crucified.  Days later, Petronius informs Vinicius that letters of Peter and Paul are found on a Christian soldier, and Tigellinus has set up a search to nab them.  Ursus and Vinicius rush to see Peter and tell him of a means to escape Rome.  Peter, unafraid, is undecided.  He wants to stay in Rome, but his followers have mostly been killed.  After days and nights in uncertainty Peter listens to Linus to leave and convert more followers elsewhere. 

The next day at dawn, two people are walking away from Rome.  One is Peter, who was persuaded to leave Rome, the other is Nazarius.   Peter sees a vague figure in the sunlight up ahead.  Nazarius sees nothing.  Suddenly Peter is astonished to recognize the vague figure as Christ and falls to the ground.  Peter in tears mutters the words, “Quo vadis, Domine?” which means, “where are you going, Lord?”  The answer which only Peter could hear is “If you desert my people, I am going to Rome to be crucified a second time.”  And Peter straightway turns around to return to Rome.  He tells the others that he has seen the Lord.  From then on he goes to the Christian cemetery to preach daily.

Two groups of soldiers are dispensed.  One group arrest Peter and the other Paul.  Even in prison, Peter converts two guards.  On the day before his crucifixion, Peter is flogged.  On the next day he was led to Vatican Hill.  He is too old to be made to carry a cross, but he walks with dignity and majesty.  Satisfied with his life’s work, Peter walks with joy.  As he walks, he envisions the future city that will be the center of the Christian world.  At last he reaches the destination and he prays and blesses the city and the world.  That evening another detachment of soldiers lead Paul outside the city.  He will have more respect since he is a Roman citizen.  He too walks with peace and tranquility.  He thinks back over his life as he walks.  When he reaches the destination of his execution, he places a veil around his head to cover his eyes.

With the Christians finally dispatched, the aristocrats of Rome hatch a plot to assassinate Nero, but Nero is ahead of them and has many of the highest nobles of Rome killed as well as their families.  Even Poppaea is killed.  The Senate trembles in fear.



###

Michelle Comment:

And Nero lost his city to St. Peter!

 

My Reply to Michelle:

Yes. I loved it!

 

Frances Comment:

Those with Bishop Robert Barron’s Word On Fire ministry will be aware that the Institute publishes a journal four times a year. The latest issue, titled ‘’Conversion,” contains a two-page article by essayist Joseph Susanka on Quo Vadis. Here are some lines which I think fit in well with our reading:

 

‘’The years Sienkiewicz spent researching the demise of the Julio-Claudian dynasty and his attentiveness to its chaotic detail give the book both focus and narrative precision. There is a power in the historical particulars that serve as the perfect backdrop to his characters’ lives. . .

 

‘’While the story of Marcus Vinicius’ journey toward the Catholic faith gives the work its narrative thrust, the most powerful image of conversion for me is that of Peter turning back toward Rome, both literally and figuratively. Petrus, the Rock, the leader of Christ’s earthly Church, must be reminded to abandon himself to divine providence, to turn back, to suffer and die, and to be transformed.

 

‘’Returning to Sienkiewicz’s work after years away, that is the most striking message the book offers me. If even St. Peter had strayed far enough from the path of truth to necessitate his Savior’s gentle chiding, how much more so must we answer Christ’s call to be renewed and transformed, again and again, day by day, until we come at last to our final home.

 

‘’Quo Vadis? Where are you going?’’

 

‘’Simon Peter answered him, ‘Lord, to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life.’ ‘’

 

— Evangelization Culture, Issue No. 18, ‘’Conversion,’’ Winter, 2023, pages 21-23.

Michelle’s  Reply to Frances:

Thank you for posting this excerpt, Frances. That image from the book has really stayed with me.

My Reply to Frances:

Wonderful, Frances. I think I'm finally going to commit and subscribe to Bishop Barron's journal. I find him the most solid of the Catholic voices speaking out there, neither part of the hermeneutic of rupture of the liberals nor the hermeneutic of suspicion of the reactionary conservatives. He is what Catholicism should be.

Frances’s Reply to Me:

Well said, Manny. I agree. Candidly, I don’t know how Bishop Barron produces all that he does, and all of high quality. For those interested in joining the Word On Fire Institute, dues are $27 a month. But there are many low cost items available, too. Right now his Lenten booklet is being offered free of charge, with only a shipping fee.

My Comment:

I had no clue how the climatic scene of Lygia and Ursus in the arena would happen.  Normally I try to look ahead of a book and know the rough outline so that I can understand the writer as the scenes develop.  For this book, I’ve known nothing nor tried to read a summary somewhere.  The Ursus and Lygia scene in the arena with the bull was breathtaking.  I had no idea that was to develop, and I had no idea how it would resolve as I read.  In that moment of Ursus and the bull locked in a death struggle I was in stunned anticipation.  I could see it going in many directions.  When Ursus won and brought Lygia’s unconscious body to the emperor’s podium and begged for her mercy—not even his—I was literally in tears.  I had joined the Roman spectators in the amphitheater, totally rooting for Ursus.  What masterful writing! 

 

I have not finished the novel, but it seems to me the Ursus struggle with the bull scene was the climax of the story, and from there on a denouement to tidy up loose ends.  Peter and Paul’s executions are part of that “tidying up.” 

 

On the other hand, Peter seeing the Lord who speaks the words that would become the novel's title seems significant enough to be a climax.  But ultimately I would argue that it's not the climax.  The novel starts with Vinicius, Petronius, Lygia, and Ursus.  Peter is really a supporting role.

 

On that note, I was surprised that neither Peter’s nor Paul’s execution was narrated.  Sienkiewicz narrated all the way to the executions but he does not show them.  They were sort of off-stage.  Was that out of respect for the great apostles?  He narrated lots of other deaths and gore.  He wasn’t shy about it before this.  I was a little surprised actually.

 


The movies take great liberties with the novel, but I include video clips despite they are not truly reflective of how they are rendered.

###

The first excerpt is from that climatic scene where Ursus is pushed into the amphitheater and Lygia is let in unconscious strapped to a bull.  I cannot excerpt the entire scene since it is too long, but the beginning is so well written that I’ll start there and let you read how it concludes on your own.

 

Vinicius shook his head. He might die in that amphitheatre, but he could not go out of it. Moreover the spectacle might begin any moment.

 

In fact, at that very instant almost, the prefect of the city waved a red handkerchief, the hinges opposite Cæsar's podium creaked, and out of the dark gully came Ursus into the brightly lighted arena.

 

The giant blinked, dazed evidently by the glitter of the arena; then he pushed into the centre, gazing around as if to see what he had to meet. It was known to all the Augustians and to most of the spectators that he was the man who had stifled Croton; hence at sight of him a murmur passed along every bench. In Rome there was no lack of gladiators larger by far than the common measure of man, but Roman eyes had never seen the like of Ursus. Cassius, standing in Cæsar's podium, seemed puny compared with that Lygian. Senators, vestals, Cæsar, the Augustians, and the people gazed with the delight of experts at his mighty limbs as large as tree-trunks, at his breast as large as two shields joined together, and his arms of a Hercules. The murmur rose every instant. For those multitudes there could be no higher pleasure than to look at those muscles in play in the exertion of a struggle. The murmur rose to shouts, and eager questions were put: "Where do the people live who can produce such a giant?" He stood there, in the middle of the amphitheatre, naked, more like a stone colossus than a man, with a collected expression, and at the same time the sad look of a barbarian; and while surveying the empty arena, he gazed wonderingly with his blue childlike eyes, now at the spectators, now at Cæsar, now at the grating of the cunicula, whence, as he thought, his executioners would come.

 

At the moment when he stepped into the arena his simple heart was beating for the last time with the hope that perhaps a cross was waiting for him; but when he saw neither the cross nor the hole in which it might be put, he thought that he was unworthy of such favor,—that he would find death in another way, and surely from wild beasts. He was unarmed, and had determined to die as became a confessor of the "Lamb," peacefully and patiently. Meanwhile he wished to pray once more to the Saviour; so he knelt on the arena, joined his hands, and raised his eyes toward the stars which were glittering in the lofty opening of the amphitheatre.

 

That act displeased the crowds. They had had enough of those Christians who died like sheep. They understood that if the giant would not defend himself the spectacle would be a failure. Here and there hisses were heard. Some began to cry for scourgers, whose office it was to lash combatants unwilling to fight. But soon all had grown silent, for no one knew what was waiting for the giant, nor whether he would not be ready to struggle when he met death eye to eye.

 

In fact, they had not long to wait. Suddenly the shrill sound of brazen trumpets was heard, and at that signal a grating opposite Cæsar's podium was opened, and into the arena rushed, amid shouts of beast-keepers, an enormous German aurochs, bearing on his head the naked body of a woman.

 

"Lygia! Lygia!" cried Vinicius.

 

Then he seized his hair near the temples, squirmed like a man who feels a sharp dart in his body, and began to repeat in hoarse accents,—

 

"I believe! I believe! O Christ, a miracle!"

 

And he did not even feel that Petronius covered his head that moment with the toga. It seemed to him that death or pain had closed his eyes. He did not look, he did not see. The feeling of some awful emptiness possessed him. In his head there remained not a thought; his lips merely repeated, as if in madness,—

 

"I believe! I believe! I believe!"

 

This time the amphitheatre was silent. The Augustians rose in their places, as one man, for in the arena something uncommon had happened. That Lygian, obedient and ready to die, when he saw his queen on the horns of the wild beast, sprang up, as if touched by living fire, and bending forward he ran at the raging animal.

 

From all breasts a sudden cry of amazement was heard, after which came deep silence.

 

The Lygian fell on the raging bull in a twinkle, and seized him by the horns.

 

"Look!" cried Petronius, snatching the toga from the head of Vinicius. The latter rose and bent back his head; his face was as pale as linen, and he looked into the arena with a glassy, vacant stare.

 

All breasts ceased to breathe. In the amphitheatre a fly might be heard on the wing. People could not believe their own eyes. Since Rome was Rome, no one had seen such a spectacle.

 

The Lygian held the wild beast by the horns. The man's feet sank in the sand to his ankles, his back was bent like a drawn bow, his head was hidden between his shoulders, on his arms the muscles came out so that the skin almost burst from their pressure; but he had stopped the bull in his tracks. And the man and the beast remained so still that the spectators thought themselves looking at a picture showing a deed of Hercules or Theseus, or a group hewn from stone. But in that apparent repose there was a tremendous exertion of two struggling forces. The bull sank his feet as well as did the man in the sand, and his dark, shaggy body was curved so that it seemed a gigantic ball. Which of the two would fail first, which would fall first,—that was the question for those spectators enamoured of such struggles; a question which at that moment meant more for them than their own fate, than all Rome and its lordship over the world. That Lygian was in their eyes then a demigod worthy of honor and statues. Cæsar himself stood up as well as others. He and Tigellinus, hearing of the man's strength, had arranged this spectacle purposely, and said to each other with a jeer, "Let that slayer of Croton kill the bull which we choose for him"; so they looked now with amazement at that picture, as if not believing that it could be real.


 

###

For the second excerpt, I’m going to post the moment where Peter, trying to escape Rome, encounters Christ who asks him where he is going?  It is where the title of the novel comes.  Peter in remorse turns around and goes back to Rome to be with the remaining Christians and, of course, face martyrdom.  The short, staccato, mostly one sentence paragraphs in this scene hits the reader in the gut.   It’s a most moving scene.

 

About dawn of the following day two dark figures were moving along the Appian Way toward the Campania.

 

One of them was Nazarius; the other the Apostle Peter, who was leaving Rome and his martyred co-religionists.

 

The sky in the east was assuming a light tinge of green, bordered gradually and more distinctly on the lower edge with saffron color. Silver-leafed trees, the white marble of villas, and the arches of aqueducts, stretching through the plain toward the city, were emerging from shade. The greenness of the sky was clearing gradually, and becoming permeated with gold. Then the east began to grow rosy and illuminate the Alban Hills, which seemed marvellously beautiful, lily-colored, as if formed of rays of light alone.

 

The light was reflected in trembling leaves of trees, in the dew-drops. The haze grew thinner, opening wider and wider views on the plain, on the houses dotting it, on the cemeteries, on the towns, and on groups of trees, among which stood white columns of temples.

 

The road was empty. The villagers who took vegetables to the city had not succeeded yet, evidently, in harnessing beasts to their vehicles. From the stone blocks with which the road was paved as far as the mountains, there came a low sound from the bark shoes on the feet of the two travellers.

 

Then the sun appeared over the line of hills; but at once a wonderful vision struck the Apostle's eyes. It seemed to him that the golden circle, instead of rising in the sky, moved down from the heights and was advancing on the road. Peter stopped, and asked,—

 

"Seest thou that brightness approaching us?"

 

"I see nothing," replied Nazarius.

 

But Peter shaded his eyes with his hand, and said after a while,

 

"Some figure is coming in the gleam of the sun." But not the slightest sound of steps reached their ears. It was perfectly still all around. Nazarius saw only that the trees were quivering in the distance, as if some one were shaking them, and the light was spreading more broadly over the plain. He looked with wonder at the Apostle.

 

"Rabbi! what ails thee?" cried he, with alarm.

 

The pilgrim's staff fell from Peter's hands to the earth; his eyes were looking forward, motionless; his mouth was open; on his face were depicted astonishment, delight, rapture.

 

Then he threw himself on his knees, his arms stretched forward; and this cry left his lips,—

 

"O Christ! O Christ!"

 

He fell with his face to the earth, as if kissing some one's feet.

 

The silence continued long; then were heard the words of the aged man, broken by sobs,—

 

"Quo vadis, Domine?"

 

Nazarius did not hear the answer; but to Peter's ears came a sad and sweet voice, which said,—

 

"If thou desert my people, I am going to Rome to be crucified a second time."

 

The Apostle lay on the ground, his face in the dust, without motion or speech. It seemed to Nazarius that he had fainted or was dead; but he rose at last, seized the staff with trembling hands, and turned without a word toward the seven hills of the city.

 

The boy, seeing this, repeated as an echo,—

 

"Quo vadis, Domine?"

 

"To Rome," said the Apostle, in a low voice.

 

And he returned.

 

###

I wish I could excerpt the executions of Saints Peter and Paul, but that would be too long.  You will just have to read the novel on your own then.




Tuesday, March 8, 2022

The Mystery of the Magi By Dwight Longenecker, Post #4

This is the fourth and final post of a series on Dwight Longenecker’s The Mystery of the Magi: The Quest to Identify the Three Wise Men.  You can read Post #1 here.  

Post #2 here. 

Post #3 here.  

 


Summary

Chapter 10, “The Star of Bethlehem”

Next Fr. Longenecker takes on the legend of the Magi following the star to Jesus.  Fr. Longenecker evaluates various theories: a supernatural phenomenon, a natural astronomical event, or an astrological reading of the night sky.  Each of these generic theories have specific possibilities.  First Longenecker attempts to understand how Matthew understood the star?

 

Matthew, of course, never says that a supernatural star guided the wise men across the desert. He mentions the star twice. First the wise men say to Herod, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star when it rose and have come to worship him” (Matthew 2:2). A few verses later Matthew continues, “After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they had seen when it rose went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was” (Matthew 2:9).  [p. 113]

I’m not going to summarize each of the theories but some of them considered are a comet, a meteor, a supernova, an alignment of planets, celestial divination, the helical rising and falling of Jupiter, and astrological reading of the stars.

Chapter 11, “Wise Men from the East”

Here Longenecker explores the understanding of Matthew’s use of the term “wise men” for the Magi and what Matthew meant by “from the East.”  In so doing Longenecker recapitulates the theory that the Magi were Nabateans star gazers, that the “East” referred to the land of the Nabateans, and how the legends of the Magi developed into what it has become.  Longenecker then goes into some of the very earliest of Christian writings—when the legends had not developed yet—and located passages from the Church fathers substantiating his theory.  Longenecker then proposes how the real knowledge of the Magi was lost as the Church center of gravity moved from the Middle East to the European continent.

###

One theory on the star of Bethlehem that Fr. Longenecker did not consider, though it would fall under the supernatural category, is that of St. John Chrysostom back in the fourth to fifth century was that the star was an angel.  I came across this theory from Aleteia, the Catholic online magazine, the other day.  Chrysostom proposed in his Homily on the Gospel of Matthew.  (Link is provided in the article.)  First he rejects the scientific phenomena theory because he does not believe there are stars that move from east to west.  

 

[W]hether it was a star by nature or a star in appearance only, we shall easily know the other things also. Whence then will these points be manifest? From the very things that are written. Thus, that this star was not of the common sort, or rather not a star at all, as it seems at least to me, but some invisible power transformed into this appearance, is in the first place evident from its very course. For there is not, there is not any star that moves by this way, but whether it be the sun you mention, or the moon, or all the other stars, we see them going from east to west; but this was wafted from north to south, for so is Palestine situated with respect to Persia.

Second he points out that no star could have been visible in the daytime.

 

In the second place, one may see this from the time also. For it appears not in the night, but in mid-day, while the sun is shining; and this is not within the power of a star, nay not of the moon; for the moon that so much surpasses all, when the beams of the sun appear, straightway hides herself, and vanishes away. But this by the excess of its own splendor overcame even the beams of the sun, appearing brighter than they, and in so much light shining out more illustriously.

Third he points out that it would be impossible for a star to come to rest above a single child, and concludes it had to be an angel.


For it did not, remaining on high, point out the place; it not being possible for them so to ascertain it, but it came down and performed this office. For you know that a spot of so small dimensions, being only as much as a shed would occupy, or rather as much as the body of a little infant would take up, could not possibly be marked out by a star…How then, tell me, did the star point out a spot so confined, just the space of a manger and shed, unless it left that height and came down, and stood over the very head of the young child? And at this the evangelist was hinting when he said, Lo, the star went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was ... Therefore after He has brought them, leading them by the hand, and has set them by the manger; it is no longer by a star, but by an angel that He now discourses unto them.

I do lean to Fr, Longenecker’s theory of an astrological prediction, but if I had to go with a supernatural theory, I do like Chrysostom’s angel theory.  If angels individually visited Joseph and Mary then why not the Wise Men?  For me none of the natural astronomical event theories make sense.

My Comment:

I subscribe to The St. Paul Center for weekly emails on the Sunday Mass readings. This is Scott Hahn's organization and he usually provides a short explanation of the readings akin to a homily. This coming Sunday (Jan 2) is the Epiphany of the Lord, where we get the readings on the Magi, and you can listen to Scott give his thoughts on these readings here.  

It's apparent Scott has not read Fr. Longenecker's book. He says the Magi "probably came from Persia." Well we now know otherwise! They came from the Nabatean Kingdom. Is n't it something that we know something about Catholicism that the great Scott Hahn doesn't? ;) At least Scott says "probably."

My Comment:

An article today by Fr. Longenecker essentially summarizing his book: "TWELVE REASONS WHY THE MAGIWERE ARABIANS NOT PERSIANS"


I guess it's from his personal blog.

###

Summary

Chapter 12, “What Happened to the Wise Men?”

This chapter divides into two parts.  The first part, Longenecker goes line by line of the Magi passage in Matthew and provides his final response to all he has walked us through in the book.  The second half of the chapter Longenecker speculates what happened to the Magi after the Nativity event and how they may have shaped Christianity afterward.  Could the Magi have settled with the Essenes of the Dead Sea Scroll community?  Could the Magi or their next generation have shaped St. Paul’s theology when St. Paul after his conversion spent three years in the desert meditating on the significance of Christ?  Longenecker provides some evidence that support those claims. 

Conclusion, “Why Does it Matter?”

Here Longenecker justifies why knowing the true history of the Magi should be known.  Because it supports the facts of the life of Jesus Christ, and knowing that the Magi were not mythical weakens the skeptic’s arguments against Christianity.

Epilogue, “What Happens to the Epiphany?”

Longenecker spends a few concluding pages on contemplating what de-mystifying the Magi implies to our understanding of the Feast of the Epiphany.  He feels it doesn’t alter it much.

###

Gerri Commented:

I didn't realize Fr. Longenecker was a priest. I knew he was a convert and thought he was a deacon.

 

In his closing pages, he, too, wants what we discussed earlier - for other scholars to take up the topic and continue the research he started.

 

And I agree with him: de-mystifying the Magi doesn't alter my understanding or appreciation of the Feast of the Epiphany.

My Reply to Gerri:

It didn't alter mine. If anything it enhanced it. What seemed like a made up story made it real for me, and in that reality it deepened my faith. Truth be told, I'm not keen on hagiographic stories, including saints' lives.

###

Before we leave this book, I wanted to discuss the second half of chapter 12, the speculative section on the Magi going to Damascus, joining with the Essenes, and then years later St. Paul spending three years learning from the Essenes and the next generation Magi.  This theory resonated quite strongly with me.  I don’t know if you have known about the three years St. Paul spent in Arabia after his conversion.  It’s in Arabia that Paul seems to discern what Christianity is all about.  Remember before his conversion experience he was a strict Pharisee.  He has his conversation on the road to Damascus where he goes blind, is taken to Christians in Damascus, has his sight returned, gives himself up to Christ, and is baptized.  Fr. Longenecker then quotes Paul.

 

“But when God . . . was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, my immediate response was not to consult any human being. I did not go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went into Arabia. Later I returned to Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Peter and stayed with him fifteen days.” (Galatians 1:11–18) [p. 148]

I’ve always been intrigued by those three years.  I always took it as he spent three years “in the desert” contemplating how Jesus fits into Judaism and what Jesus as a crucified, “failed” messiah means.  The messiah to the Pharisees was supposed to be a conquering hero who was going to overthrow the earthly shackles on the Jewish people.  But Jesus didn’t do that.  But Paul clearly had a supernatural experience encountering Christ, and so he could not deny Christ wasn’t who He said He was.  So how did this all fit together?  We see from Paul’s letters he more than any of the apostles derives the theology from the Old Testament and from Christ’s life and teachings.  Was this theology all from Paul’s contemplative three years in Arabia? 

Fr. Longenecker lays out some important questions.

 

[Jean] Daniélou mentions [in Primitive Christian Symbols] an ancient tradition that Paul was converted at Castle Kokhba, the name of which means “Star Tower.” If there is truth to the ancient tradition, then Paul was blinded by a radiant light at Kokhba, which means “star.” Was his sudden illumination seen as a sign of direct divine revelation similar to the star that had led the Magi to Christ?

 

Immediately after his conversion Paul went into Arabia for three years. What prompted him to do that? His sojourn in Arabia has mystified scholars. Some suggest he went there to begin his missionary work, but this seems unlikely so soon after his sudden conversion. Others suggest that he went into Arabia for a meditative retreat, like Jesus’ forty days in the wilderness.

 

The New Testament scholar Margaret Barker observes, “After his conversion, Paul went to Arabia, and his visit may help to identify the magi. He came back better informed about his new faith and able to explain that Christianity was rooted in something older than the law of Moses. Who instructed him?” (p. 149)

I don’t know about that blinding light being connected with the Magi star, but what exactly did Paul do in the Arabia and how did he become so insightful to Christianity?  I think it’s generally acknowledged that Christian thought more directly derives from Essenes’ Judaism and not the Pharisee’s understanding of Judaism. 

One could quote almost all of Longenecker writing from page 148 to 154, but that would be too extensive.  Let me just quote these paragraphs which kind of pulls together his theory:

 

We find in Paul’s theology a synthesis of the same three cultural and religious strains that we find in the Nabateans. The first strain is Abrahamic Judaism. This is the Judaism from before the destruction of Solomon’s temple by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC. The Arabian tribes claimed descent from Abraham, and Nabatean religion had its roots in the earlier Abrahamic religion. This earlier form of Judaism was also the religion of the Jewish refugees who fled into Arabia in the sixth century BC.

 

The second strain in Paul’s theology is the mystery religions that had grown out of Mesopotamian culture and were the second source of Nabatean culture and religion. Paul warns his followers of the dangers of mystery religions, but he also uses the language and imagery of the mystery religions, correcting them and using them to point to the mystery of redemption in Jesus Christ.

 

Paul also understands Greek philosophy, which he integrates successfully into his theology. The Nabateans had also absorbed and integrated elements of Greek culture, religion, and philosophy.

 

Somewhere and somehow, Paul learned how these three elements could be fused to explain the gospel of Jesus Christ to a non-Jewish audience. Did he develop his theology during his three years in Arabia and Damascus? Who were his teachers? Did Paul learn from a school of Nabatean wise men? Was he taught by the Magi themselves?  (p. 150-1)

Longenecker goes on to expand on each of these strains teasing out the theology Paul formulates from them.  I don’t know if Longencker is perfectly correct on what Paul formulates from these strains but I do think he is on to something as to Paul’s sources.  What cannot be argued against is that Christianity is not Pharisaic Judaism, and Paul’s Christian theology is much more than what comes from the Pharisees.  I’m a supporter of Longenecker’s theory here. 

###

Kerstin Commented:

Fr. Longenecker is definitely on to something. He is connecting the story of the Magi with the larger cosmology. On the last page, p. 164, he writes:

The Magi's whole world view and cosmology were predicated upon a belief that the "heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament shows his handiwork."

We in the West have gotten lost in the weeds over the past centuries in materialism, functionalism, legalism, etc., etc. We have looked less and less to the heavens and wondered at the Cosmological Order as a whole. In contrast, Eastern Orthodoxy has retained this sense of wonder and mystery of the Cosmological Order.

 

On page 154 Fr. Longenecker writes:

The foundation of the Jewish religion is the covenant of faith that was established with Abraham and his descendants. Margaret Barker suggests that this Abrahamic religion was considered the original by the refugees from the destruction of Jerusalem and that they considered the legalistic religion that emerged after the exile to be an illicit development

Immediately I thought of the division between the more legalistic Roman Rite and the more mystical Eastern Rite. What a parallel!

 

Here is a 16 minute video from the Christian artist Jonathan Pageau who has a You Tube channel called "The Symbolic World". Jonathan is a convert to Eastern Orthodoxy. In this recent video he goes into detail of How Christmas Reorganizes the Gods by the example of an Orthodox hymn called the Nativity Troparion. You will find it has everything to do with what we've read here. It will give a deeper understanding of what Fr. Longenecker is getting at. He didn't pluck any of this out of thin air.

 



Also, Jonathan had an hour-long conversation with Bishop Robert Barron on A Return to Cosmic Christianity. It dovetails nicely here.

 

My Reply to Kerstin:

Do you mean "legalistic" or more based on "reason" for the Roman Rite? There's faith and reason and one needs both. I do see the Eastern Rite as less based on reason and more on mysticism than the Latin Rite. But frankly too far to the mystical turns me off. It feels superstitious or disconnected from basic science. There needs to be a balance of faith and reason. I'm not sure the Latin Rite has it about right but whenever I listen to Eastern Rite speakers it feels like they are disconnected from reason. For me, Pope Benedict XVI has it perfectly.

 

By the way, by reason I don't mean to support Enlightenment rationalism as Fr. Barron denounces in the second video. There is a balance between faith and reason and an imbalance in either direction is disturbing.

Frances Replied to My Comment:

Manny, I am not trying to speak for Kerstin -- she can do that quite beautifully on her own! -- but as I read her post I thought of the word "transcendence." The Roman Rite has lost somewhat a sense of the transcendent; Bishop Robert Barron has referred to this condition at times as a "flattening out." I think the yearning for that sense lies behind the hunger for the Latin Mass. We want "The Other," a sense of the transcendent.

Kerstin Replied:

By "legalistic" I was thinking in the direction of splitting hairs too much, of overcomplicating things, being too rationalistic. Jesus fought the Pharisees on this all the time.

 

We are all products of our own culture, and hence the Roman Rite is what fits me, and I would imagine many of us here. At the same time I find the Eastern Rites fascinating, how they have preserved liturgical rituals and hymnody over the centuries. There is a very pronounced sense of reverence and the holy. I delight in their artistry. What I think is important for us to remember is that the Christian faith emerged in a cultural space that is far more eastern than we are. We may not be used to or comfortable with to move in the mystical space they do, but we have to know about it for better understanding. That's my take.

 

Going back to our book and the mystery of the star, Jonathan Pageau says that for the ancients and the cosmic order they lived in, a star and an angel is the same thing! The stars were the gods, or angels, or beings of the higher order. With this mystical element in mind, that a star/angel showed the Magi where to find Jesus makes perfect sense.

My Reply to Kerstin:

Well said Kerstin. I think we're saying the same thing. I lean toward Thomas Aquinas and Pope Benedict XVI who are just as mystical and transcendence but can support the mystery through reason. I'm not saying the Eastern Orthodox can't support it but I haven't seen it and in a number of places (like in writings of Dostoyevsky) I've seen ridicules of Latin reason. But Dostoyevsky is not a theologian, so I probably shouldn't link Orthodox theologians to him.

Joseph Replied:

Manny, if you haven't read St. Maximus the Confessor, he's a good example of how eastern theologians meld mysticism and reason. Weighing in on Kerstin, Frances, and Madeleine's point, as a priest who celebrates both the Mass of the Ages and the Mass of Paul VI there is a tangible difference in how the two relate to the Divine. My first time attending the Ancient Mass I was just as lost as could be, but as I was exposed to it more I learned how to enter into the prayer and see what goes on. This is not to discount the New Rite, I have also had mystical experiences there, but the Ancient Mass is more in tune with our mystical senses than is the New.

Kerstin Replied:

Manny wrote: " I'm not saying the Eastern Orthodox can't support it but I haven't seen it and in a number of places (like in writings of Dostoyevsky) I've seen ridicules of Latin reason. But Dostoyevsky is not a theologian, so I probably shouldn't link Orthodox theologians to him."

I had to think on this a bit. The divergence goes all the way back to the "filoque" dispute in the Nicean Creed. What exactly is Dostoevsky reacting to? He especially dislikes the Jesuits. I wonder if it had to do with modernism and even secularism seeping into the Latin Rite, and this posed a danger of Orthodoxy being susceptible to the same erosion of Tradition.

My Reply to Kerstin:

I don' think it has anything to do with the filioque. He was xenophobic, like a good number of Russians. Don't get me wrong, he's a great novelist, among the handful of greatest, but he was anti western, and that involved the Catholic Church. I remember a good number of gibes directed toward Poles and Germans. There is a section of his greatest novel, The Brothers Karamzov called The Grand Inquisitor. Read about that here: 

 

He has a Catholic Bishop put Jesus through an inquisition and ultimately condemns Jesus to death. Now there is a lot of psychological and theological stuff going on. It's a great scene. But he didn't have to have a Catholic Bishop be the inquisitor. It didn't have anything to do with Catholicism.

###

When driving home yesterday afternoon from shopping, I had Relevant Radio, a Catholic radio channel around the country, on my radio and on the Drew Moriani show he had Fr. Dwight Longenecker on to discuss his Magi book. It was a twenty-ish minute conversation, and while he didn’t say anything that was not in the book, it was still a blessing to listen to it. Now that all radio shows get turned into podcasts, you can access the show and listen for yourself. So the Relevant Radio podcasts get broken into hour long units. Fr. Longenecker’s portion was the first half of the hour. The second half was a discussion about the guiding star with Fr. Chris Corbally, a priest astronomer. That was interesting and is worth listening to. Here is the link to the “Hour 3 of The Drew Mariani Show 12-22-21.”  

###

Well, tomorrow Jan 6th is the Feast of the Epiphany of the Lord, the day we readers of this book have been waiting for. I'm almost sure you will have this hymn played at Mass tomorrow. It was my hymn for my Vespers prayer this evening, which would make it the vigil of the feast.

 

We Three Kings

Composer: Rev. John Henry Hopkin (‎1857)

 

We three kings of Orient are

Bearing gifts we traverse afar

Field and fountain, moor and mountain

Following yonder star.

 

O Star of wonder, star of night

Star with royal beauty bright

Westward leading, still proceeding

Guide us to thy Perfect Light.

 

Born a King on Bethlehem's plain

Gold I bring to crown Him again

King forever, ceasing never

Over us all to reign.

 

O Star of wonder, star of night

Star with royal beauty bright

Westward leading, still proceeding

Guide us to thy Perfect Light.

 

Frankincense to offer have I

Incense owns a Deity nigh

Prayer and praising, all men raising

Worship Him, God most high.

 

O Star of wonder, star of night

Star with royal beauty bright

Westward leading, still proceeding

Guide us to thy Perfect Light.

 

Myrrh is mine, its bitter perfume

Breathes of life of gathering gloom

Sorrowing, sighing, bleeding, dying

Sealed in the stone-cold tomb.

 

O Star of wonder, star of night

Star with royal beauty bright

Westward leading, still proceeding

Guide us to thy Perfect Light.

 

Glorious now behold Him arise

King and God and Sacrifice

Alleluia, Alleluia

Earth to heav'n replies.

 

O Star of wonder, star of night

Star with royal beauty bright

Westward leading, still proceeding

Guide us to thy Perfect Light.

Here is a beautiful version by the opera singer, Mario Lanza. 



###

My Goodreads Review:

More precisely, four and a half stars.  This is a book that locates the historical roots of the story that has become the legend of the three “wise men/kings” who come to the nativity of Christ offering Him gifts.  Mind you, what is in the Bible, more precisely, the Gospel of Matthew, is not the legend.  The legend has been built up from elaborations and folklore, built up so much that hardly anyone believes the legend.  But the Biblical story is there in Matthew, and so what are we to make of it? 

Fr. Dwight Longenecker—the author is a Roman Catholic priest—breaks down the parts of what is actually in the Bible and finds their historical basis, and in so doing saves the story for we believers.  What seemed like a made up story made it real for me, and in that reality it deepened my faith. Truth be told, I'm not keen on hagiographic stories, including saints' lives.  The legend of the Magi went beyond hagiography. 

So Fr. Longenecker goes on to show the Magi were not from Persia or some disparate region of the world.  They were not kings.  And they probably didn’t even ride camels.  So who were these mysterious men who have been linked to the exotic?  Were they exotic?  Yes, but not in ways you expect.  Read the book.  It was methodically argued and quite compelling.

###

This may be the final post on Fr. Longenecker’s book, but there will be two related posts on the Magi, two famous poems, T.S. Eliot’s “The Journey of the Magi” and G.K. Chesterton’s “The Wise Men.”  I will link them after I post them.