The Mass was held at Sacred Heart Church, which
stunned me with its beauty. Sacred heart
must be one of the most beautiful churches on Staten Island. It’s a brick Romanesque style with a bell
tower, a rose window over the Narthex, a lovely domed Apse with Christ showing
his sacred heart in the back and a suspended crucifix high above before the
altar. It has two full domed Transepts
with shrines, each shrine with three statues.
In addition there is a shrine with a statue on each side of the altar,
Christ with His sacred heart on one and our Blessed Mother on the other. I had never been in this church before, but
it did occur to me as I walked about and praying at the shrines before Mass how
humble my regular church was in comparison.
I can’t find any photos of the inside of the church,
but here is the front facade.
I should give one other piece of background before I
give my impressions. I have argued with
the Latin Mass-ers (those that insist on returning to pre-Vatican II
everything) that we should not go back to Latin only. I’m not saying we should eliminate the Latin
Mass; it should certainly be an option, and I wish it were more readily
available. But there is a directness to listening
to the Word of God in your natural language that engages both your soul and
intellect. The Latin Mass-ers counter
that Latin provides a sacred link back to the Church origins, a sort a language
of the divine.
That is a good point, but to that I counter that why
Latin? Christ at the last supper spoke
in Aramaic; the apostles must have used it in their liturgies. The New Testament is written in Greek, and surely
the Greek liturgy came before Latin as the apostles radiated outward from
Jerusalem. Even if looks at Christianity
as a continuity from Judaism, Hebrew was spoken in worship at the Temple. So one could argue that Latin could be fourth
in line if one were to search the primeval Christian tongue. And I argue further, that when you look at
the liturgies in the early centuries, Aramaic was used in the lands around
Jerusalem, Coptic Egyptian in eastern Africa, Greek in the Greco half of the
Roman empire, and Roman in the western half of the Roman empire. If you look at those centuries, the liturgies
were performed in the vernacular of each region. So why shouldn’t we be celebrating Mass in
the vernacular of today’s world?
So I have quipped to my Latin Mass-er friends, what
language would God use to celebrate Mass in heaven? Aramaic, of course, the language of Jesus,
and St. Peter will hand out the Rosetta Stone CDs at the Pearlie Gates to learn
the language. Would you believe that there are still
Churches that perform Mass in Aramaic?
My blogger friend, Joyce, who had such a fine Catholic Blog and was such
a strong proponent of the Latin Mass, pointed out to me that the MaroniteCatholics still celebrate in Aramaic and as it turns out they have a church not
far from me over in Brooklyn. That’s my next excursion, to attend a Mass in
Aramaic, the language of Jesus Christ.
So what did I think of the Latin Mass? I knew going in that the Extraordinary Form
(Latin Mass) was structured differently than the Ordinary
Form (vernacular). They are not the same
liturgy with only a language substitution.
For a good summary of the differences between the two forms read
here. My first mistake was sitting in the front
row. I wanted the full experience and
since I got there early I got the best seat.
However, I had no feel for the sitting, standing, and kneeling parts,
and with no one in front of me as a guide I was off. I also knew beforehand the priest performs
the liturgy facing the altar, and therefore facing God and not the
congregation, but it felt a little nerve racking never seeing the priest’s
face. The other different part was that during
the consecration of the holy sacrament the priest in certain sections speaks
under his breath while the whole church goes silent. I’m not saying any of that was negative, just
different.
I wish the missal we were reading from was more use-
friendly. It’s hard enough the Mass
spoken in a language I’m not fluent (they did have English translation on the
facing page) but because certain sections applied to different types of Masses
(High Holiday, for the dead, etc.) you had to jump around in the missal. I gave up in mid way. One surprise for me was that at receiving communion
the priest doesn’t say in Latin what is said in English, “Body of Christ.” There is a long sentence in Latin that the
priest says to each recipient, and being in the front I could see the priest
was getting tongue tied after a while. The
congregation must have had a couple of hundred attending. And the priest was getting tired. There were two altar rails, one on each side,
and he had to go back and forth. Oh yes,
we had to kneel at the altar rail and receive on the tongue only. I hadn’t received on the tongue since a
teenager.
One thing I did love was the Latin hymns. They are more beautiful than those in
English. Two sung that I remember were
Panis Angelicus and Salve Regina.
Overall it was a pleasant experience. My complaints I listed are minor. I’m so glad I got to go and will go again if
the opportunity arises. It hasn’t
changed my opinion though. The Latin
Mass should be available for those that want it, but I wouldn’t mandate
it. The average parishioner will get so
much more from one in his vernacular.
I’ll leave you off with this beautiful rendition.
I haven't been to a Latin Mass either. I like to sit in the middle to back regardless because I like to see as much of the church and congregation that I can.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good idea Kathy. I should have thought of that.
DeleteOh yes I agree about not sitting in the front. It WILL get easier with time. I wish I could go every week, but commitments at my own parish and family things often preclude -- ours is at noon on Sunday in a beautiful part of downtown Philly.
ReplyDeleteThat is a good question about the universality of Latin in the Church. My hunch is that Latin is the root of many languages, and maybe even the strong link with Italian, and the epicenter of the Church being in Rome. But that's all just a guess.
I have had trouble with the skipping around also. Now what I do is only loosely follow the book and look up more, watch, and immerse myself in the prayer. the rest is slowly coming along. I can almost stay with the Credo, lol. That, to me, is the most complicated, with standing, sitting, kneeling, genuflecting; all while following the singing while trying to read the chant form of the music.
I do love to connect to the ancient Church. I love the reverence. It puts God in His rightful place, or closer to it anyway. Some of the Novus Ordo masses are unbelievably irreverent. Not all. But I come away feeling I have encountered the Divine. And oh the music! I hope you had a schola. The one at ours is breathtaking. And the organist is incredible as well. That aspect alone is an enormous blessing.
Anyway, I am glad you got to go. If you get to the one where they speak Aramaic, I do hope you'll share your experience.
I will on the Aramaic Mass. It would make a great post. ;) I can't say I found the Latin Mass any more spirtual than the OF. I do prefer the vernacular.
DeleteManny, I can't recall my first Latin mass but I do remember my mom telling me that she wanted me to be an altar boy and longer story short, I made her proud by eventually being the captain of my own twin altar boy team.
ReplyDeleteWhat really struck me back then was the faith that I saw in the people and most if not all while kneeling to receive the host seem like angels because they appeared so passionate while our good priest was serving them.
The high mass was great but what really struck me as you took me down memory lane was that in the late fifties and early sixties while following the priest around to make sure these human angels were kneeling to receive on their tongue, if "The Body of Christ" was dropped, it was as if they had lost a very important Host who was coming for a visit.
Don't get me wrong! I don't know what the Pros and Cons are nowadays about The Latin Mass, all I know is that if souls, spirits and Guardian Angels were around back then and longer story short, looking at it all now, I guess that everything started to go spiritually down hill for me back then and I'm not just saying that because I stole a few dollars from the church. Our good priest Father Francis simply looked me in the eyes and said in French. Victor, there are a LOT of hypocrites in this world and....
END YA SAY NOW VICTOR?
Go Figure brothers and sisters in Christ? :)
God Bless Peace
LOL, on the hypocrites in this world. I would think it's just as irreverant if at today's mass someone dropped the host. I'm as careful as can be. I do prefer it in the hand.
Delete