I live on Staten Island, the most remote of the five boroughs of New
York City, and we have four major bridges that connect us to the outside world,
three bridges that connect us to New Jersey, and one that connects us to
Brooklyn. The Kill Van Kull is a channel
that separates us from Bayonne, New Jersey, and as
you can imagine a lot of shipping goes through that channel. Spanning the channel is the Bayonne Bridge
(they never name anything after Staten Island), which on certain times of the
year I can see the top from my bedroom window.
I think it’s in the winter time that the trusses of the arch becomes
visible, when the leaves are off the trees and I have an unobstructed
view. I’ve never considered the Bayonne
Bridge to be aesthetically beautiful, so I’ve never thought much of being able
to see it. Houses on Staten Island that
have views of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge are very expensive; view of the
Bayonne Bridge does nothing for my home value.
Apparently they will be building cargo ships well
beyond current size. They are currently
huge, so what they will be building is like the largest mammal set side by side
to a dinosaur. Super container ships will be the transport vehicle of choice, as
soon as they can build them. This has
caused ports around the world to modify their ports to accommodate these super vessels. Dredging bottoms, widening harbors, building accommodating
structures for loading and unloading are some of the projects going on for the
sake of improving logistics. You can
read about that here.
They have dredged parts of New York Harbor, either
for this reason or just for some sort of maintenance. But to really accommodate these super
container ships, they will have to raise the roadway of the Bayonne
Bridge. The current clearance must
interfere with the tops of these super containers. So instead of tearing down the bridge, they
will build the roadway above the current roadway, and then take down the old
roadway, so that in the end there will be more clearance for the super
ships.
Does that sound interesting? Absolutely!
As an engineer, that really piques my interest. Building on top of an existing bridge is way
more complicated and difficult than building one from scratch, or at least
intuitively it would seem that way. Here’s
a video of the project plan. It’s breathtaking.
I wonder what the cost savings are for building on
top rather than building from scratch. That’s
some heck of a project. I’m a mechanical
engineer, but projects like that might have swayed me back in college into
being a civil engineer. I would love to
manage that project. When they are into
it, I’ll be sure to go by the bridge and take some pictures.
Now one thing I don’t understand is how tall are
these super ships? From the movie clip
it looks like there is plenty of vertical clearance. However when I looked up the dimensions of
the bridge, it claims there is only 14 ft (4.3m) clearance. Fourteen feet to the water level? That’s not even two stories. It’s got to be higher than that. It looks way higher than two stories when I’m
driving on it.
One last thing.
I work in New Jersey and though we (my carpool) don’t regularly take the
Bayonne Bridge, we might switch to it on occasion when traffic at the Goethals
Bridge is jammed. We’ve decided that
while this project is going on, we’ll suffer with the traffic and avoid the
Bayonne. A project that complex has got
to have something go awry. It will be a
miracle if they execute the entire project flawlessly. I hate to be the car under the beam that
falls.
What a wonderful informative post Manny. Thanx. Different from your usual literature posts. What a marvellous engineering project too. The video is superb and explains it well. I really enjoyed this post.
ReplyDeleteGod bless.
Exactly what Victor SE said- almost word for word what I was thinking! :)
ReplyDeleteGreat. Glad you both enjoyed that. I'll have to stray from literature every once in a while.
ReplyDelete