"Love follows knowledge."
"Beauty above all beauty!"
– St. Catherine of Siena

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Notable Quote: On the Novel by Henry James

I’ve been reading Henry James novel, Washington Square, and though I don’t think this is a great work, it does show the absolute skill he had in writing novels.  He truly was “the master.” 

I want to put two of his quotes side by side to show what I think is a central insight into the nature of the novel. 

Experience is never limited, and it is never complete; it is an immense sensibility, a kind of huge spider-web of the finest silken threads suspended in the chamber of consciousness, and catching every air-borne particle in its tissue.
        -Henry James
 

The only reason for the existence of a novel is that it does attempt to represent life.
        -Henry James

The second quote gets at what the art of the novel is all about.  It is not just a story.  A short story tells a story, but it does not represent life.  A novel reproduces experience, and what is experience?  From James’ first quote, a web of consciousness.  And it doesn’t necessarily correlate with length.  Some novels are just expanded stories, but a truly great novel represents a web of consciousness through story.
 
 

Friday, March 14, 2014

Faith Filled Friday: A Personal Note on the Departure of our Pastor

I’ve been bummed out all week, ever since the pastor at my church, Fr. Richard Veras of St. Rita’s on Staten Island, announced he was being transferred.  They have this rule in the New York City dioceses that a priest is assigned for six year terms to a parish, with the option of remaining for two terms or twelve years.  After that he must be reassigned unless he’s of retirement age.  For the past year I was worried about this.  I wasn’t sure which year Fr. Veras came to St. Rita’s but I suspected he was coming up on his six year term. One the one hand I figured they would give him a second term, since that is typically the case, but on the other hand I knew that Fr. Veras is special and I’m sure the dioceses would want him to serve in a higher capacity.  So at the end of Mass this past Sunday when just before dismissal he had us sit down for an announcement, and when he said that with such a solemn and glum expression, I had a feeling.  The feeling was correct.  He was being reassigned to a high school (Our Lady of Lourdes) in Poughkeepsie, NY where there was some important—I can’t remember exactly, going in one ear and out the other—need for his services.  Though the congregation seemed somewhat surprised, they gave him a round of applause.

What makes Fr. Veras special?  Well, first he writes, and perhaps I’m prejudice for writers but anyone who writes has formulated his thoughts into a coherence.  If you know the Catholic magazine, Magnificat, he’s a frequent contributor.   In fact if you have the current special Lenten edition, he’s in there.  Second, he’s written books.  I haven’t read any to endorse them, but here on Amazon you can see his two published works.  I’ll now have to buy one and check it out. 

Third he brings the community together around the church.  One of the first things he did when came was gather together all the reminisces of one of his predecessors, who was the pastor for several decades at St. Rita’s, and put it together into a book.  It was a decade’s long look at the life and times at the parish.  He organized parish trips and retreats and dinners.  The school is thriving and highly ranked.  He’s a leader in the regional Communion and Liberation Movement and he’s gotten some of the local high school kids to be a part of it.  Fourth he instituted a Lenten series where every Friday night during Lent he brings in a speaker or dramatist or musician which reflects our faith.  It’s wonderful and it now makes the newspaper as a major article.  Here’s the article for this year’sseries. 

The former Swiss Guard for Pope John Paul II now CEO was last week’s speaker and packed the church.  He was a great speaker.  Tonight is a dramatic monologue of St. Francis of Assisi performed by a professional actor.  I know people who come to these Lenten events from out of state.  You have to understand, we are a small, humble parish.  It takes a special person to entice speakers and musicians to come, and I’m pretty sure he’s not paying them.  Here’s a picture of our humble church looking down the nave.  It’s a flat roof, flat ceiling with a skylight and mundane stain glass windows that are way up on top where you can’t even see much of them.  Fr. Veras has put St. Rita’s on the map.


Fourth, coming to mass is special.  People say hello to each other, know each other, welcome each other.  I only know people by face, but they say hello to me too.  The rosary group, the prayer groups, the charitable events all pull people together around the parish.  The musical director is excellent and an opera singer in her other job.  Both the children’s choir and the adult choir have plenty of volunteers.  For Easter and Christmas we get additional musicians and singers.  They did a great Little Drummer Boy rendition with a really good drummer, who was probably ten years old, this past Christmas.  I met a person a few years ago and when I said I belonged to St. Rita’s parish he said he heard how something special was happening there.  He wondered what and I couldn’t answer him at the time.  But it’s been Fr. Veras.

Fifth, and finally the most important to me, Fr. Veras gives the best homilies.  At my son’s baptism he gave a wonderful homily connecting the baptism to the Old Testament.  Remember, my wife and her family are Jewish, and I know they felt a little uncomfortable.  He connected their tradition as it grew into the Christian tradition and made everyone feel at ease.  My mother’s cousin, who is an elderly priest and attended the baptism said afterward Fr. Veras was magnificent.  Here’s  a confession.  When I go to mass and it’s not Fr. Veras celebrating, I’m disappointed, especially if I expected him.  Besides being insightful on the scripture reading, he connects the readings with life, either his life or someone he encountered or read about.  And the central core of his preaching is that through friendship and love and community we encounter Christ.  It’s not just that He is present.  He is always present, but that through contact with others, through our sacrifice, we encounter Him tangibly.  Whether it was someone who saved another during the holocaust or a new born who was saved from an abortion or feeding the destitute at a soup kitchen, you physically encounter Christ.

I know I’m not doing his sermons complete justice.  You have to understand that I’ve only returned to the Church these last six years, which completely overlaps Fr. Veras’s tenure.  I’ve been a sinner, even an atheist and agnostic.  I’m not going to say the transformation was due solely to Fr. Veras.  No, there’s a multiplicity of reasons, including reading through the devotion of lots of Catholic bloggers on the internet, some of you who may be reading this now.  But Fr. Veras was a most important part of it.

I did find a picture of him on the web.  Here he is, a most humble man. 

On my recent Ash Wednesday post I said I was looking forward to Lent.  Well, if you’re looking forward to Lent, it’s probably not hard enough.  Now I can taste the bitterness of true Lenten sacrifice.


Lord, I thank you for the six years I was blessed to have Fr. Veras as pastor, and may his new assignment be means to enlighten many more people.  May his future be bright and may we carry his spirit forward with the transition.  In Christ I pray.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Music Tuesday: Tarantella Napoletana

Well, I happen to be in an Italian mood.  Scenes from Naples, the nearest major city from where I'm originally from.



The reason I'm in an Italian mood is that a friend sent me the following video of the ten things to love about Italy.  I thought it was enjoyable, and because I couldn't place the music I added the above video.  It sounds like a tarantella, but it's not.  The way the woman at the beginning is making pasta is exactly like my mother makes pasta.  I think the video captures Italian life well.


Hope you enjoyed them both.

Friday, March 7, 2014

Faith Filled Friday: Lenten Reads

With Ash Wednesday a couple of days ago, we began the Lenten season.  In addition personal penance, fasting, extra prayer, contemplation of Christ’s Passion, an intellectually minded Christian should also read a spiritual work during the 40-something days leading to Easter Sunday.  This year I’ve decided to read a medieval work, The Imitation of Christ  by Thomas à Kempis The work was completed around 1427 by a German monk (or perhaps a combined effort of three monks) in the Netherlands.  I’ve been cautioned by several people here that this might now be the most exciting read.  What motivated me to read this, though, was that this book was at one point the most read book after the bible.  So without fear, I have jumped into it and will provide some observation in the coming weeks.

In addition, I hope all will take up some religious work.  Here are a number of ideas.  First let me plug books on what I have now considered the patron saint of this blog, St. Catherine of Siena.  My Lenten read from last year was a biography by the Nobel Prize winning author, Sigrid Undset, CatherineOf Siena.  I also posted four blogs on my reading of the biography which you can find here.   
I also recommend these two other books on St. Catherine, though I’ve only perused them.  A book of her prayers, The Prayersof Catherine of Siena: 2nd Edition by Suzanne Noffke and an understanding of her theology, Catherine of Siena: Spiritual Development inHer Life and Teaching by Thomas McDermott. 

In addition you can find some really good ideas for Lenten reads from two Catholic crackerjack book smiths, bloggers Elizabeth Scalia at The Anchoress and Julie Davis at Happy Catholic.  They both provide a long list of great ideas to read during Lent.  I’m just going to list the books they recommend, but both posts give little summaries of the books and links to the Amazon page, so check out their write ups.

From The Anchoress’s “Lenten Reading Recommendations 2014”:

Jesus the Bridegroom: The Greatest Love Story Ever Told by Brant Pitre.
Jesus of Nazareth by Pope Benedict XVI.
Jesus: A Pilgrimage by James Martin, SJ.
Julian’s Gospel: Illuminating the Life and Revelations of Julian of Norwich, by Veronica Mary Rolf.
The Showings of Julian of Norwich: A New Translation by Mirabai Starr.
Provocations: Spiritual Writings of Kierkegaard by Soren Kierkegaard.
Yes, God!: What Ordinary Families Can Learn about Parenting from Today’s Vocation Stories, by Susie Lloyd.
Through the Year with Pope Francis: Daily Reflections by Pope Francis.
Gulag: A History by Anne Applebaum.
With God in Russia, by Fr. Walter J. Ciszek SJ.
Mercy in the City: How to Feed the Hungry, Give Drink to the Thirsty, Visit the Imprisoned, and Keep Your Day Job, by Kerry Weber.
Beginning to Pray by Anthony Bloom.
Cultivating God’s Garden Through Lent, by Margaret Rose Realy.
Simplifying the Soul: Lenten Practices to Renew Your Spirit by Paula Huston.
The Romance of Religion by Father Dwight Longenecker.
God for Us: Rediscovering the Meaning of Lent and Easter edited by Greg Pennoyer and Gregory Wolfe.
Naked and You Clothed Me: Homilies and Reflections, with contributions from Deacon Greg Kandra, James Martin, SJ, Rob Bell and others.
 
And don’t forget Ms. Scalia’s books:
Strange Gods: Unmasking the Idols in Everyday Life by Elizabeth Scalia.
I Don't Want to be a Hoo-er by Elizabeth Scalia.

From Happy Catholic’s “Lenten Reading Ideas”:
The Medium and the Light: Reflections on Religion and Media by Marshall McLuhan.
The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien.
Night Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko.
The Curse of Chalion by Lois McMaster Bujold.
The Reapers Are the Angels by Alden Bell.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J. K. Rowling. 
In This House of Brede by Rumer Godden.
Five for Sorrow, Ten for Joy by Rumer Godden.
The Space Trilogy by C.S. Lewis.
The Last Monk of Tibhirine by Freddy Derwahl.
A Song For Nagasaki by Fr. Paul Glynn.
The Bells of Nagasaki by Takashi Nagai.
When the Carpenter Was King by Maria von Trapp.
Lectio Divina books by Stephen J. Binz.
Night of the Confessor by Tomas Halik.
Gospel of Mark, The (Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture) by Mary Healy.
To Know Christ Jesus by Frank Sheed.
The School of Prayer: An Introduction to the Divine Office for All Christians by John Brook.
Beginning to Pray by Anthony Bloom.
Contemplating the Trinity: The Path to Abundant Christian Life by Fr. Raniero Cantalamessa.

And don’t forget Ms. Davis’s books:
Happy Catholic by Julie Davis.
Lord, Open My Heart: Daily Scriptural Reflections for Lent by Julie Davis.

 
One common pick between the two bloggers is Anthony Bloom’s Beginning to Pray.  That sounds interesting enough to pick it up.  I’m always looking for more ideas on prayer.
Have you read any of the recommendations?  I’d like to hear your thoughts on them if you have.  I may pick a second read for Lent, and I can’t decide which one.  Do you have any recommendations?

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Ash Wednesday & The Book of Judith

As most of you know, today is Ash Wednesday, a day of fasting, repentance, meditation on our mortality, and the initiation of the Lenten season.

The Wikipedia entry I linked shows the biblical heritage of the ritual, citing Job, Jeremiah, Daniel, First Book of Maccabees, Numbers, and Jonah for citations of the use of ashes in the Old Testament, Matthew and Luke in the New Testament.  It also cites Ezekiel chapter 9 for the marking of sinner’s foreheads for repentance, without any mention of ashes.  But Wikipedia does not mention any citation from the Book of Judith.  

 
I’ve recently been reading the Book of Judith as part of my working through the bible and low and behold I read chapter 4 shortly before Ash Wednesday.  Let me set the context.  The troops of King Nebuchadnezzar of the Assyrians have captured and slaughtered all of Israel’s neighbors and now have directed their attention to them.  The Israelites are preparing for the invasion. 

10They, along with their wives, and children, and domestic animals, every resident alien, hired worker, and purchased slave, girded themselves with sackcloth.
11And all the Israelite men, women, and children who lived in Jerusalem fell prostrate in front of the temple and sprinkled ashes on their heads, spreading out their sackcloth before the Lord.
12The altar, too, they draped in sackcloth; and with one accord they cried out fervently to the God of Israel not to allow their children to be seized, their wives to be taken captive, the cities of their inheritance to be ruined, or the sanctuary to be profaned and mocked for the nations to gloat over.
13The Lord heard their cry and saw their distress. The people continued fasting for many days throughout Judea and before the sanctuary of the Lord Almighty in Jerusalem.
14Also girded with sackcloth, Joakim, the high priest, and all the priests in attendance before the Lord, and those who ministered to the Lord offered the daily burnt offering, the votive offerings, and the voluntary offerings of the people.
15With ashes upon their turbans, they cried to the Lord with all their strength to look with favor on the whole house of Israel.
                        -Jth 4:9-15

I was surprised when I read that passage.  I didn’t recall anyone ever alluding to the Book of Judith for the history behind Ash Wednesday, but there it is.  And what’s startling, is that in this passage they actually mention the sprinkling of ashes on foreheads (verse 11).  Of all the other passages, I think only the First Book of Maccabees references ashes and forehead together.  So the Book of Judith might actually be one of two of the clearest references to the Ash Wednesday ritual in the entire bible.  They will have to update that Wikipedia entry.  :)

 
I love Ash Wednesday and I hope I can get to a mass to receive ashes.  It looks like I will be traveling out of town for work and not sure what my schedule will be like.  I’m looking forward to Lent.  It has replaced the overly commercialized Advent/Christmas season as my favorite time of year.  I know we fast and pray and struggle during the Lenten season, but when you love God fasting, praying, and struggling is sweetness.


May God bless you all on this holy day. 

Monday, March 3, 2014

Matthew Monday: I Guess I’m Straight

The other day, I was watching television and Matthew climbs on the couch, crawls up to me, and asks, “Daddy are you straight?” 

Whoa?  Where did that come from?  I think my jaw must have dropped.  My mind went racing.  Does he know about straight and gay?  Kids pick up everything these days, and there is no way to stop them from picking these words up.  So how do I answer this?  And once I say straight, how do I follow up with an explanation?  Should I ask him what he means first?  Should I ask him where did he hear it and from whom?  Was it another kid at school?  Was it adult conversation he overheard?  Was it from television?  Darn that television has gotten too explicit.  
Then in his right hand is a level and he places it up against my chest.  “Are you straight,” he asks again. 

Flashback comes across my mind.  The two of us are in my basement a couple of weeks ago looking for a hammer or a screwdriver (I can’t remember which) and he picks up a little level and asks what it is.  I didn’t know how to describe the concept of being level to a four year old, so I said it checks to see if something is straight.  Then I showed him by placing it up against a counter.  “See how the mark shows between the lines?  That means it’s straight.” 

He found it cool.  “Can I have this daddy?” 

It was a small one that I never use, so I said sure.  He took it up and it got mixed with his toys. 

Return to scene.  “Are you straight Daddy?”  He placed the level up against my chest. 

I let out a big sigh.  “Yes, I’m straight Matthew.”
 
 
 

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Lines I Wished I’d Written: His Little Girl from Washington Square by Henry James

I’ve been reading Henry James’s   novel, Washington Square and this passage from the first chapter is so prescient.  The novel is about a woman, Catherine, and her father, Dr. Austin Sloper, who refuses to give his blessing—and therefore his inheritance—to his daughter to marry a particular young man of limited means, Morris Townsend.  Catherine is his only child; her mother died shortly after birth, and Dr. Sloper has an austere character. 


His first child, a little boy of extraordinary promise, as the Doctor, who was not addicted to easy enthusiasms, firmly believed, died at three years of age, in spite of everything that the mother's tenderness and the father's science could invent to save him. Two years later Mrs. Sloper gave birth to a second infant--an infant of a sex which rendered the poor child, to the Doctor's sense, an inadequate substitute for his lamented first- born, of whom he had promised himself to make an admirable man. The little girl was a disappointment; but this was not the worst. A week after her birth the young mother, who, as the phrase is, had been doing well, suddenly betrayed alarming symptoms, and before another week had elapsed Austin Sloper was a widower.
For a man whose trade was to keep people alive, he had certainly done poorly in his own family; and a bright doctor who within three years loses his wife and his little boy should perhaps be prepared to see either his skill or his affection impugned. Our friend, however, escaped criticism: that is, he escaped all criticism but his own, which was much the most competent and most formidable. He walked under the weight of this very private censure for the rest of his days, and bore for ever the scars of a castigation to which the strongest hand he knew had treated him on the night that followed his wife's death. The world, which, as I have said, appreciated him, pitied him too much to be ironical; his misfortune made him more interesting, and even helped him to be the fashion. It was observed that even medical families cannot escape the more insidious forms of disease, and that, after all, Dr. Sloper had lost other patients beside the two I have mentioned; which constituted an honourable precedent. His little girl remained to him, and though she was not what he had desired, he proposed to himself to make the best of her. He had on hand a stock of unexpended authority, by which the child, in its early years, profited largely. She had been named, as a matter of course, after her poor mother, and even in her most diminutive babyhood the Doctor never called her anything but Catherine. She grew up a very robust and healthy child, and her father, as he looked at her, often said to himself that, such as she was, he at least need have no fear of losing her. I say "such as she was," because, to tell the truth--But this is a truth of which I will defer the telling.
            -From Chapter 1

Excerpt from the Literature Network.   

So much of the novel is in germ form in that passage.  Dr. Sloper’s love for his daughter, and yet she wasn’t his son.  We see a bitterness which he never overcame over the deaths of his son and wife, tied together with his sense of failure as a doctor.   

Let me connect this passage with a description of Catherine from the next chapter.  Mrs. Penniman is Dr. Sloper’s sister who helps raise Catherine. 

She was a healthy well-grown child, without a trace of her mother's beauty. She was not ugly; she had simply a plain, dull, gentle countenance. The most that had ever been said for her was that she had a "nice" face, and, though she was an heiress, no one had ever thought of regarding her as a belle. Her father's opinion of her moral purity was abundantly justified; she was excellently, imperturbably good; affectionate, docile, obedient, and much addicted to speaking the truth. In her younger years she was a good deal of a romp, and, though it is an awkward confession to make about one's heroine, I must add that she was something of a glutton. She never, that I know of, stole raisins out of the pantry; but she devoted her pocket-money to the purchase of cream-cakes. As regards this, however, a critical attitude would be inconsistent with a candid reference to the early annals of any biographer. Catherine was decidedly not clever; she was not quick with her book, nor, indeed, with anything else. She was not abnormally deficient, and she mustered learning enough to acquit herself respectably in conversation with her contemporaries, among whom it must be avowed, however, that she occupied a secondary place. It is well known that in New York it is possible for a young girl to occupy a primary one. Catherine, who was extremely modest, had no desire to shine, and on most social occasions, as they are called, you would have found her lurking in the background. She was extremely fond of her father, and very much afraid of him; she thought him the cleverest and handsomest and most celebrated of men. The poor girl found her account so completely in the exercise of her affections that the little tremor of fear that mixed itself with her filial passion gave the thing an extra relish rather than blunted its edge. Her deepest desire was to please him, and her conception of happiness was to know that she had succeeded in pleasing him. She had never succeeded beyond a certain point. Though, on the whole, he was very kind to her, she was perfectly aware of this, and to go beyond the point in question seemed to her really something to live for. What she could not know, of course, was that she disappointed him, though on three or four occasions the Doctor had been almost frank about it. She grew up peacefully and prosperously, but at the age of eighteen Mrs. Penniman had not made a clever woman of her. Dr. Sloper would have liked to be proud of his daughter; but there was nothing to be proud of in poor Catherine. There was nothing, of course, to be ashamed of; but this was not enough for the Doctor, who was a proud man and would have enjoyed being able to think of his daughter as an unusual girl. There would have been a fitness in her being pretty and graceful, intelligent and distinguished; for her mother had been the most charming woman of her little day, and as regards her father, of course he knew his own value. He had moments of irritation at having produced a commonplace child, and he even went so far at times as to take a certain satisfaction in the thought that his wife had not lived to find her out. He was naturally slow in making this discovery himself, and it was not till Catherine had become a young lady grown that he regarded the matter as settled. He gave her the benefit of a great many doubts; he was in no haste to conclude. Mrs. Penniman frequently assured him that his daughter had a delightful nature; but he knew how to interpret this assurance. It meant, to his sense, that Catherine was not wise enough to discover that her aunt was a goose--a limitation of mind that could not fail to be agreeable to Mrs. Penniman. Both she and her brother, however, exaggerated the young girl's limitations; for Catherine, though she was very fond of her aunt, and conscious of the gratitude she owed her, regarded her without a particle of that gentle dread which gave its stamp to her admiration of her father. To her mind there was nothing of the infinite about Mrs. Penniman; Catherine saw her all at once, as it were, and was not dazzled by the apparition; whereas her father's great faculties seemed, as they stretched away, to lose themselves in a sort of luminous vagueness, which indicated, not that they stopped, but that Catherine's own mind ceased to follow them.
                        -From Chapter 2

Add now to the mix that Dr. Sloper thinks of his daughter as limited, both in beauty, which apparently might be true, and in intelligence, which is not true.  But as you can surmise, Dr. Sloper questions Morris Townsend’s intentions.  He concludes that Townsend is only after her money. 

One final note.  The novel is set in New York City in late 19th century.  It was published in 1880.  Washington Square  of the book's title is a park in Manhattan.  In the 19th century it probably was considered uptown, since what is today uptown was undeveloped then.  I was surprised to find out that the notable arch  that is there in Washington Square Park was built in 1892, after the novel’s publication.  I was imagining it as part of the setting, but it’s not there.  Here's a picture that might have been taken before automobiles.  The surrounding area is much more metropolitan now.