Hat tip to Kathy Schiffer at Seasons of Grace blog for making me aware of this.
Who knew Vatican City had a National Anthem, but it is its own country, so one shouldn’t be surprised. Well, it’s not like they win medals in the
Olympics for us to hear of it. The
current National Anthem, the Inno e
Marcia Pontificale, was actually composed in 1869 by Charles Gounod, a
French composer (who also composed Ave Maria), but it did not
officially become the Vatican City anthem until 1949, replacing the previous
anthem of 1829, the Marche trionfale, composed by the Austrian Vicktorin Hallmayer.
Actually let’s compare the two. Let me first post the earlier Hallmayer
composition.
Now here is the current Anthem, the Gounod.
Which
do you prefer? I think both are
characteristic of the national origins of the respective composers. Remember both are Marches, which means they are
intended for a formal procession. Hallmayer
has a 19th century Austrian military bearing. The Gounod, with its brass flourishes, has an
air of French ceremony.
However,
the Gounod music had lyrics composed by Antonio Allegra (later translated to
Latin by Raffaello Lavagna) and a chorus has been added to the
March. Without any lyrics and chorus, I would say
that I prefer the previous Hallmayer, Marche
trionfale. But Allegra’s chorus adds
a layer to the Gounod Marche Pontificale
that I can only describe as “churchy music.”
To my ear it takes the March and makes it a hymn.
What
do you think?
Both
versions are not exactly brilliant compositions. They sound rather routine as far as Marches or
National Anthems go. Most national
anthems are quite boring actually. I
think we’re spoiled in the US with our Star Spangled Banner.
It
will probably be a rare day when we hear the Vatican City National Anthem
again. Unless of course the cardinals
field a super basketball team—they don’t seem tall enough though—or the Holy
Father is able to win the 100m backstroke.
Both unlikely.
The first one sounds very John Plillips Souza-y to me. It continues images of merry go rounds.
ReplyDeleteAt least the second one is a bit more melodic and stately.
Yes, that first one has what I would call 19th century pop orchestration. I think that's what you're hearing.
DeleteI just saw all the typos in my comment. My apologies. Typing on my Kindle without glasses, having it autocorrect as I go. Not a good situation. Lol.
DeleteLOL, I didn't even pick up n any. What does that say about me? ;)
Delete