"Love follows knowledge."
"Beauty above all beauty!"
– St. Catherine of Siena

Thursday, September 17, 2026

LOTR, The Fellowship of the Ring, Post 7

This is the sixth post of a series of posts on J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings.  This series focuses on the first volume of the trilogy, The Fellowship of the Ring.

You can find the first post here. 

The second post here.

The third post here.

The fourth post here. 

The fifth post here.

The sixth post here.




  

Summary: Bk1 Ch 12

Chapter 12: Flight to the Ford

 

In the confusion of the Dark Riders attack and stabbing, Frodo, Strider and Sam take Frodo’s limp body and place it by the fire.  The companions worry Frodo may not live.  Frodo does not die but is terribly weakened.  Strider made some balm with vegetation to nurse the wound.

Despite the pain, Frodo continued with the journey with the companions in the dark and under the fear the Dark Riders would return.  Strider even decided to return to the road for a while for easier travel.  By the marsh of one of the rivers, Strider finds a beryl—an elf stone, which he takes as a positive sign.  Their journey took them to a confluence of two rivers.  Most of the time Frodo rode on a donkey but there were times he had to dismount to strive on foot.  He had difficulties climbing and was physically getting worse, not better.  Along the way they came across three figures of trolls who had been turned to stone.  Sam remembered a song about trolls and sang it. 

At one point they heard the sound of hooves, and they spotted a white horse, which alleviated their fears of it being a Dark Rider.  Strider went out to meet the rider of the white horse, and he brought back an elf from the house of Elrond.  The elf’s name was Glorfindel.  Glorfindel told them he had been tracking them and it was he who left the beryl as a sign. 

As Glorfindel spoke, Frodo collapsed in pain.  Strider explained what had happened to Frodo, and Glorfindel applied some elf medicine to the wound which revived Frodo enough to travel on.  Glorfindel provided Frodo his white horse to ride. 

Several days later they reached the Ford of Rivendell, and, with the Dark Riders racing toward them, the companions rushed across the Ford.  Midway across the Dark Riders were about to snag Frodo, but the water rose to a flood and drowned several of the Dark Riders’s horses and pulled the others away. Frodo, confused, also fell into the water, where he then passed out.

 

Summary: Bk 2 Ch 1

Book II

Chapter 1: Many Meetings

 

When Frodo came to, he found himself in a bed, and Gandalf above him explaining that he was in the house of Elrond and that it was now October 24th.  Frodo has been unconscious for four nights and three days.  He also explained that Frodo had nearly died at the Ford.  He told Frodo that there will be a Council as soon as Frodo is well enough to attend.  He explained that Strider, also called Aragorn, is of the old Kings, and that Glorfindel is an elf lord of a house of princes.  He explained the Dark Riders are Ringwraiths, and though the horses have perished they are not so easy to kill, but they are now handicapped without their horses.  Gandalf explained that the flood was commanded by Elrond, which is in his power.

After Frodo awakened from another sleep, Sam came in and took Frodo about the house.  They came upon Merry and Pippin, and everyone at the house were celebrating in a feast for Frodo’s arrival.  He met Elrond and Glorfindel, Elrond’s daughter Arwen, and her brothers Elladan and Elrohir.  Strider was there and a dwarf named Glóin. 

They made their way to the Hall of Fire, a quiet place of contemplation.  In the hall at a table was a dark figure apparently asleep but as it turned out was meditating.  Elrond tried to awaken him but he was awake, and then Frodo saw that it was Bilbo.  They had a splendid and heartfelt reunion.  Bilbo introduced Frodo to his friend Dúnadan, who turned out to be still a third name for Aragorn.  Dúnadan had told Bilbo of Frodo’s adventures.  Bilbo asked Dúnadan to help him with a poem he was composing, and when ready Bilbo chanted the verses of the poem.  Afterward, Frodo went back to his own room.




###

Comment from Ellie:

There is a lot in these chapters, I think, especially in the second one, but what I wanted to share here (and I hope it at least partially belongs to this topic) was a quote from a video essay on Aragorn and his (healthy) masculinity I watched today; I've always loved the notion that Aragorn is a great healer AND a great king; and even though he wasn't able to heal Frodo, we could see this characteristic show itself, for the first time in the book I think? Here is the quote:

 

"Your strength is not for yourself. It is for others. Physical power is important for masculinity, yes, but that is because it allows us to better protect those whom we love. In carrying out that duty is one of, if not THE central aspect of a man's job. As long as there have been wars, it has been largely the role of the man, often sadly the young man, to defend his nation, his people. ... When Christ child was in danger, it was St. Joseph who was entrusted with the mission to bring the Holy family to safety. By nature, man are granted larger frame, denser bones, and more muscle mass than women. And with those physical advantages comes a duty that cannot be denied without denying the very essence of what it means to be a man in relationship with others. Indeed, embracing full authentic virtuous masculinity, requires one to be in relationship. ... Human beings do not exist alone; we were not made for ourselves, but rather for each other. Aragorn clearly knows this. He seeks the company of those who need him, ..."

 

I do like the line that I think is crucial for the Catholic faith that "... Human beings do not exist alone; we were not made for ourselves, but rather for each other. " I think we can even see that in the second chapter, when all of the characters gather around for a dinner or, later, to tell stories and sing songs in a great hall; we can even see that in Bilbo asking Aragorn to help him finish some verses of his song. Again, there is a great notion of communion and kinship.

 

To use Tolkien's own words: Aragorn is "a great instrument in God's hands. A mover, a doer, even an achiever of great things. A beginner at the very least of large things.”

 

I really hope this is not too off the topic!!

My Reply to Ellie:

That is a great quote Ellie. The fullness of Aragorn's character is still to be realized. I think this is something to keep in mind as we read on. He has always been mysterious to me, and I don't think in my reading as a young man I understood him. He does seem like the ideal man, doesn't he? Aragorn as healer is not something I realized or noticed before. I will definitely keep it in mind as we progress. Thanks.

 

By the way, where is that quote from?

Ellie’s Reply to Me:

The quote is from a video essay called "Why We Need Aragorn’s Example of Masculinity" on a channel called 'Master Samwise' (the link is here)

 


 

They also have a video on Sam and his character, but I have yet to watch that one! I definitely recommend watching it! 

Kristen Reply to Me:

Manny wrote: "He does seem like the ideal man, doesn’t he?"
Very much so. I was just thinking which male characters in literature come close to him and I’m fumbling a bit. Many times we are presented with a flawed/immature character who then grows into maturity, but with Aragorn these years are in the past and yet he plays a major leading role in the quest.

My Reply to Kerstin:

Good point. It would not typically be the central character of a novel, because he usually needs to to grow into it. It would have to be a contrasting character. Hmm, Levin from Anna Karenina, the contrasting male figure of the Levin and Kitty relationship comes to mind. But I haven't read the novel in a while, so I'm not sure if that is perfect. Oh, and there is Atticus Finch - who is usually considered the ideal father - from To Kill a Mockingbird.

Michelle’s Reply to Kerstin:

I always liked that about Aragorn. He has a weight of history and competence about him immediately upon his entry into the story. It's really unusual. 

###

So what seems to be important in these chapters I think is the near death experience Frodo undergoes and his resuscitation.  Since leaving the Shire, it has been a struggle for Frodo and the companions, traversing forest, rivers, and hills, escaping Dark Riders and undergoing scrutiny.  All these hardships climax with the attack of the Dark Riders, which leaves Frodo “pierced” (the word used in the second to last paragraph in the chapter “A Knife in the Dark”) and struggling to fight off the poison or demonic spirit (I can’t tell which) inherent to the Dark Riders’ weapon.  That Tolkien uses the word “pierced” has to allude to the Suffering Servant passage of Isaiah:

 

Who would believe what we have heard?  To whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?  He grew up like a sapling before him, like a shoot from the parched earth; He had no majestic bearing to catch our eye, no beauty to draw us to him. He was spurned and avoided by men, a man of suffering, knowing pain, like one from whom you turn your face, spurned, and we held him in no esteem.  Yet it was our pain that he bore, our sufferings he endured.  We thought of him as stricken, struck down by God and afflicted, But he was pierced for our sins, crushed for our iniquity.  He bore the punishment that makes us whole, by his wounds we were healed.  (Is 53:1-5)

Granted, not everything in the passage applies to Frodo—he wasn’t spurned—but he certainly endured suffering and was notably pierced.  Frodo is here a Christ-figure by his suffering.  But it’s more than that. 

 

Suddenly to his horror Sam found that his master had vanished; and at that moment a black shadow rushed past him, and he fell. He heard Frodo’s voice, but it seemed to come from a great distance, or from under the earth, crying out strange words. They saw nothing more, until they stumbled over the body of Frodo, lying as if dead, face downwards on the grass with his sword beneath him. Strider ordered them to pick him up and lay him near the fire, and then he disappeared. That was now a good while ago.

Frodo’s journey is a microcosm of human experience.  Life can be a struggle, companionship, joy, suffering, and then deathly pain, and finally death.  Here Frodo metaphorically dies.  He is heard as if “under the earth.”  They stumble over “his body.”  He is “lying as if dead, face downwards on the grass.”  Sam even despairs in tears for his friend. 

Eventually Frodo does get up, and his companions nurse his wound.  He will struggle on, if not mortally wounded then potentially mortally wounded. 

There is a subsequent confrontation at the Ford.  Frodo, atop the white horse, is rushing across the Ford to safety, when he is pierced again, this time metaphorically:

 

He shut his eyes and clung to the horse’s mane. The wind whistled in his ears, and the bells upon the harness rang wild and shrill. A breath of deadly cold pierced him like a spear, as with a last spurt, like a flash of white fire, the elf-horse speeding as if on wings, passed right before the face of the foremost Rider.

Again Tolkien uses the word “pierced,” and here he could have chosen many ways to describe the effect of the evil on Frodo.  I’d like to consider this a metaphysical piercing, the cold breath of evil stabbing “like a spear,” alluding of course to the piercing of Christ on the cross by the Roman soldier’s spear.

But once across the Ford, the pack of Dark Riders accost him, forcing Frodo to turn and fight.

 

But the pursuers were close behind. At the top of the bank the horse halted and turned about neighing fiercely. There were Nine Riders at the water’s edge below, and Frodo’s spirit quailed before the threat of their uplifted faces. He knew of nothing that would prevent them from crossing as easily as he had done; and he felt that it was useless to try to escape over the long uncertain path from the Ford to the edge of Rivendell, if once the Riders crossed. In any case he felt that he was commanded urgently to halt. Hatred again stirred in him, but he had no longer the strength to refuse.

 

Suddenly the foremost Rider spurred his horse forward. It checked at the water and reared up. With a great effort Frodo sat upright and brandished his sword. ‘Go back!’ he cried.

 

‘Go back to the Land of Mordor, and follow me no more!’ His voice sounded thin and shrill in his own ears. The Riders halted, but Frodo had not the power of Bombadil. His enemies laughed at him with a harsh and chilling laughter. ‘Come back! Come back!’ they called. ‘To Mordor we will take you!’

 

‘Go back!’ he whispered. ‘The Ring! The Ring!’ they cried with deadly voices; and immediately their leader urged his horse forward into the water, followed closely by two others.

That’s quite a scene.  You can see the powerlessness of Frodo as he is about to undergo what might be seen as a Passion narrative.  We are told in the next chapter that if he had been captured, he would have been tormented by the Dark Lord.  He is even mocked here, and this might amount to a crucifixion but for a miracle event, what Tolkien describes as a eucatastrophe.    

 

At that moment there came a roaring and a rushing: a noise of loud waters rolling many stones. Dimly Frodo saw the river below him rise, and down along its course there came a plumed cavalry of waves. White flames seemed to Frodo to flicker on their crests, and he half fancied that he saw amid the water white riders upon white horses with frothing manes. The three Riders that were still in the midst of the Ford were overwhelmed: they disappeared, buried suddenly under angry foam. Those that were behind drew back in dismay.

 

With his last failing senses Frodo heard cries, and it seemed to him that he saw, beyond the Riders that hesitated on the shore, a shining figure of white light; and behind it ran small shadowy forms waving flames, that flared red in the grey mist that was falling over the world.

 

The black horses were filled with madness, and leaping forward in terror they bore their riders into the rushing flood. Their piercing cries were drowned in the roaring of the river as it carried them away. Then Frodo felt himself falling, and the roaring and confusion seemed to rise and engulf him together with his enemies. He heard and saw no more.

A rushing flood of the river overturns the Dark Riders.  Frodo too falls beneath the waves and goes unconscious.  Here is a second metaphorical death for Frodo.  We are told later that Strider saved him, and he, after some bleak moments in an unconscious state, revives at Rivendell.  He has gone through a rebirth, a regeneration, perhaps even a resurrection.  If we haven’t identified Frodo with Christ before, we should certainly do so now.




###

Ellie Reply:

Also, Manny, so many good points! I'm really glad you mentioned the 'eucatastrophe', because the scene with Frodo and the Dark Riders really seems like the perfect example of a eucatastrophic scene and it's also important, because Tolkien considered it the most important function of a fairy-story. In 'On Fairy-Stories" Tolkien explains this term in depth, but what I really love is his connecting it to the Gospel, when in one of his letters he writes that: "And I concluded by saying that the Resurrection was the greatest 'eucatastrophe' possible in the greatest Fairy Story – and produces that essential emotion: Christian joy which produces tears because it is qualitatively so like sorrow, because it comes from those places where Joy and Sorrow are at one, reconciled, as selfishness and altruism are lost in Love. "

###

There are numerous interesting details that I can’t completely fathom from the first chapter of Book II.  What exactly is the nature of Rivendell and of the Elves?  Do they have supernatural powers?  It is the Elves ability to counter the dark powers that saved Frodo from death, pulling out the splinter that had been embedded in Frodo’s body.  That seems to be from more than just skill.  Dark powers, one would think, require good powers to repel them.  When Gandalf is beside Frodo’s bed explaining all that happened, Frodo asked him about the flood.

 

‘Who made the flood?’ asked Frodo.

 

‘Elrond commanded it,’ answered Gandalf. ‘The river of this valley is under his power, and it will rise in anger when he has great need to bar the Ford. As soon as the captain of the Ringwraiths rode into the water the flood was released. If I may say so, I added a few touches of my own: you may not have noticed, but some of the waves took the form of great white horses with shining white riders; and there were many rolling and grinding boulders. For a moment I was afraid that we had let loose too fierce a wrath, and the flood would get out of hand and wash you all away. There is great vigour in the waters that come down from the snows of the Misty Mountains.’

How does one command a flood?  How is the river under Elrond’s power?  Now there could be a non-supernatural explanation.  The river could have been dammed up and the dam opened upon Elrond’s command.  But is that what happened?  Or was it a supernatural command over nature, and if so how does that fit into a Christian worldview?  Why and how did the waves of the flood take on the form of great white horses?  Does someone know more about this?

So what is the nature of elves?  Earlier in that conversation, Frodo asks Gandalf himself.

 

‘What about Rivendell and the Elves? Is Rivendell safe?’

 

‘Yes, at present, until all else is conquered. The Elves may fear the Dark Lord, and they may fly before him, but never again will they listen to him or serve him. And here in Rivendell there live still some of his chief foes: the Elven-wise, lords of the Eldar from beyond the furthest seas. They do not fear the Ringwraiths, for those who have dwelt in the Blessed Realm live at once in both worlds, and against both the Seen and the Unseen they have great power.’

 

‘I thought that I saw a white figure that shone and did not grow dim like the others. Was that Glorfindel then?’ ‘Yes, you saw him for a moment as he is upon the other side: one of the mighty of the Firstborn. He is an Elf-lord of a house of princes. Indeed there is a power in Rivendell to withstand the might of Mordor, for a while: and elsewhere other powers still dwell. There is power, too, of another kind in the Shire. But all such places will soon become islands under siege, if things go on as they are going. The Dark Lord is putting forth all his strength.

 

‘Still,’ he said, standing suddenly up and sticking out his chin, while his beard went stiff and straight like bristling wire, ‘we must keep up our courage. You will soon be well, if I do not talk you to death. You are in Rivendell, and you need not worry about anything for the present.’

Quite a few details stick out from that passage.  The Elvin-wise Lords “live in both worlds,” can be before the Dark Lords and not be harmed, and they have “great power.”  So what is the nature of this power?

Glorfindel is an Elf-lord, and one of the “Firstborn.”  Firstborn has a Biblical echo, and why is it capitalized?

We learn there is a “power in Rivendell” that can “withstand the might of Mordor.”  What exactly is the nature of this power, and must it be supernatural to withstand the evil power of Mordor?  Why does Frodo not have to fear while in Rivendell?

Indeed Rivendell seems like paradise in many ways.  Elves are “ageless” and shining.  Frodo is saved there and ‘resurrected.”  Everything is orderly and ideal.  There is a sort of liturgy in the Hall of Fire where songs are chanted and tales are told.  And there are feasts to form fellowship, and unlike Bilbo’s feast at his birthday at the beginning of the novel, there is no animosity between the guests.  It all seems so heavenly. 

So what should we make of all this?

###

Ellie Comment:

Good questions Manny. I think the answers to all of these require the reading of The Silmarillion, where the nature of Elves is explained.

 

I think the explanation to Elrond's power comes in the next chapter, The Council of Elrond, where we learn about the three Rings of Power that the Elves made. If I'm not mistaken, Galadriel of Lothlórien has one, and I just have to assume that Elrond has one, too; Vilya is the name of it, and from what I could glean online, it has the ability to heal (with its help, he probably healed Frodo) and so we can guess that it also has the power to control some elements. I don't think the elves have "magic powers", but that they utilize the Rings. But that's for further discussion.

 

About the Firstborn question - indeed, Elves are Firstborn, because they were the first "creatures" to be awakened/made in the world of Arda, particularly Middle-Earth. Yes, there are the Valar, but I think they are more like angelic creatures, while the Elves (and subsequently Men), are children of Eru Illúvatar, of the creator who made them.

 

I also think that the safety of Rivendell could be attributed to the fact that Elves are indeed the Firstborn, some of them (I'm thinking of Glorfindel here) saw the light of Valinor, a place where the Valar live, a place where they rule, a place where the Elves are trying to go (we could say it's a place that resembles Heaven?), a place where their true home is. I think Rivendell might resemble Valinor in the sense that it's a place full of light, which the Enemy can't reach.

 

I admit that we are (and will be) bombarded with information about the First and Second Ages and not all of it is explained in the LoTR books, so it can be confusing. But indeed all of these questions probably require a heavy study of Tolkien's works, like The Silmarillion, and it makes me wonder how he was able to create all of this!

My Reply to Ellie:

Thanks for the explanation Ellie, that is really helpful. I haven't read the next chapter yet. Perhaps tonight.

Ellie’s Reply to Me:

Of course, always my pleasure! I think the next chapter is going to give us more information and more stuff to discuss since it's pretty long and info-dense.




###

One last major comment on this section.  The reunion of Frodo and Bilbo was magnificent.  It was such a captivating scene that I’m going to quote the passage for everyone’s enjoyment, despite it being a bit lengthy.  This has the feeling to me of being in heaven and reunited with a loved one.

 

At length the feast came to an end. Elrond and Arwen rose and went down the hall, and the company followed them in due order. The doors were thrown open, and they went across a wide passage and through other doors, and came into a further hall. In it were no tables, but a bright fire was burning in a great hearth between the carven pillars upon either side.

 

Frodo found himself walking with Gandalf. ‘This is the Hall of Fire,’ said the wizard. ‘Here you will hear many songs and tales – if you can keep awake. But except on high days it usually stands empty and quiet, and people come here who wish for peace, and thought. There is always a fire here, all the year round, but there is little other light.’

 

As Elrond entered and went towards the seat prepared for him, Elvish minstrels began to make sweet music. Slowly the hall filled, and Frodo looked with delight upon the many fair faces that were gathered together; the golden firelight played upon them and shimmered in their hair. Suddenly he noticed, not far from the further end of the fire, a small dark figure seated on a stool with his back propped against a pillar. Beside him on the ground was a drinking-cup and some bread. Frodo wondered whether he was ill (if people were ever ill in Rivendell), and had been unable to come to the feast. His head seemed sunk in sleep on his breast, and a fold of his dark cloak was drawn over his face.

 

Elrond went forward and stood beside the silent figure. ‘Awake, little master!’ he said, with a smile. Then, turning to Frodo, he beckoned to him. ‘Now at last the hour has come that you have wished for, Frodo,’ he said. ‘Here is a friend that you have long missed.’

 

The dark figure raised its head and uncovered its face.

 

‘Bilbo!’ cried Frodo with sudden recognition, and he sprang forward.

 

‘Hullo, Frodo my lad!’ said Bilbo. ‘So you have got here at last. I hoped you would manage it. Well, well! So all this feasting is in your honour, I hear. I hope you enjoyed yourself?’

 

‘Why weren’t you there?’ cried Frodo. ‘And why haven’t I been allowed to see you before?’

 

‘Because you were asleep. I have seen a good deal of you. I have sat by your side with Sam each day. But as for the feast, I don’t go in for such things much now. And I had something else to do.’

 

‘What were you doing?’

 

‘Why, sitting and thinking. I do a lot of that nowadays, and this is the best place to do it in, as a rule. Wake up, indeed!’ he said, cocking an eye at Elrond. There was a bright twinkle in it and no sign of sleepiness that Frodo could see. ‘Wake up! I was not asleep, Master Elrond. If you want to know, you have all come out from your feast too soon, and you have disturbed me – in the middle of making up a song. I was stuck over a line or two, and was thinking about them; but now I don’t suppose I shall ever get them right. There will be such a deal of singing that the ideas will be driven clean out of my head. I shall have to get my friend the Dúnadan to help me. Where is he?’

 

Elrond laughed. ‘He shall be found,’ he said. ‘Then you two shall go into a corner and finish your task, and we will hear it and judge it before we end our merrymaking.’ Messengers were sent to find Bilbo’s friend, though none knew where he was, or why he had not been present at the feast.

Isn’t that special.  Some of the charge from the scene was from the gap between when we last saw Bilbo and the anticipation of meeting him again.  Now wouldn’t the reunion have had even more anticipation if the scene was pushed even further into the story?  Now who am I to tell Tolkien how to plot—and I imagine there are very good reasons to have this reunion at this point—but would the reunion have been even grander if it had occurred at say two thirds of the way through the trilogy rather than at two thirds of the way through the first volume?  Just a thought.



###

Michelle Comment:

It would have had a greater impact later, except for the setting deeper into the story. Bilbo is happy in Rivendell, [and I have trouble imagining him in Mordor].

Michael Comment:

Thank you Manny for your summary, and thanks to everyone for the fascinating comments and observations on these two chapters.

 

I wonder whether another aspect of Frodo's Christ-like nature can be seen through his relationship with Sam, who (e.g. in his impetuosity and unintended humour) sometimes comes across like Simon Peter.

My Reply to Michael:

Thank you Michael! That is a very apt comparison which never crossed my mind, and it does strike me as intentional. We’ll see as we go on. So would that mean then that Merry and Pippin correspond to James and John?

Frances Comment:

I hope this is not an inapt place to insert a small scene from real life that sheds light on the beautiful, fatherly character of the artist J.R.R. Tolkien. In her book Tolkien’s Modern Reading, Holly Ordway tells us of this lovely incident: When he was a very young, highly strung little boy, “upstairs in bed at night, Christopher would sometimes become fearful that his father would work so hard that something terrible would happen . . .

 

“On one occasion, unable to hear any noise from downstairs, he made his way down to his father’s study to check nothing was wrong. Tolkien was working on a watercolor, the picture of Rivendell. Relieved to find his father alive and well, Christopher began to weep, and a single tear —a substantial one — dropped onto the painting. His father did not chastise him or discard the work in progress. . . Rather, he picked up his brush and re-painted the tree where the tear had fallen, gently incorporating the little splash into his design: he changed the leaves.” (Page 292)

My Reply to Frances:

Haha! Great story. Thank you Frances.





Monday, September 14, 2026

Personal Note: New Family Member Oreo

We have a new family member!  A spunky little kitten we named Oreo for obvious reason.





So here’s what happened.  I mentioned in a blog last year that a cat gave birth to kittens under our back deck and we fed them and they grew into our outdoor cats.  There were five kittens last year plus the Mama Cat.  We named the kittens Shadow, Star, Twinkle, Patches, and Witchy.  Shadow and Witchy were pure black cats.  Star was a black cat with a white star-like patch on his chest.  Twinkle was the same except the star patch on her chest was about half the size.  Patches was a black and white, almost in the tuxedo arrangement.  Mama Cat was identical to Twinkle.  Once grown you couldn’t tell them apart except that Mama Cat would hiss at you all the time.

Four of the five kittens survived.  Witchy either hurt her hind legs or developed some sort of physical problem.  She hobbled for a while.  I tried to catch her to take her to a veterinarian but couldn’t.  Ultimately she disappeared, either left or died.  The four kittens made it through the winter, grew into healthy strong cats, and commanded our backyard as their personal territory.  Mama Cat would come and go, but mostly stayed away.

Now I’ve used gender nouns so far, but frankly I can’t tell which of the kittens are male or female.  Come the end of spring, there were a bunch of kittens with the now grown cats.  At one count we had a dozen kittens running around our back eating the food we leave out.  How many different litters there are, we’re not exactly sure.  Mama Cat came back to deliver another set of kittens.  Patches is definitely the mother of another set.  It’s possible that Twinkle, who looks like her mother, is also a mother of a litter.  Here is either Mama Cat or Twinkle nursing her kits.



I can’t tell if that’s Twinkle or Mama Cat, but you can see the kittens are black or black and white.  Quite a few of the kittens are black and white, and that’s because I suspect the father is a big black and white Tom Cat that wonders the neighborhood.  Other colors of the kittens are either all grey or grey and white.  Here is an adorable grey and white we call Pickles.



Now we also have gone back through the pictures of the backyard and found Oreo with his mother.  That’s Oreo playing with the blue string. 



Only Oreo has that white ring coloring around the back of his neck.  So we know that’s him.  So his mother is either Mama Cat or Twinkle, I can distinguish the two. 

So what happened is Matthew wanted one of the kittens for inside for the longest time and was plotting to grab one when the opportunity presented.  One morning, while the kittens were feeding and Oreo was not on his guard, Matthew swooped him up and brought him in.  This was on Tuesday (Sept8th) just after Labor Day.  Rochelle and Matthew brought him to a veterinarian on Thursday who said he was healthy.  So in less than a week, he has become integrated into our home.

The vet assigned him a birthday of July 3rd (7/3/26) which would make him eight weeks old, but frankly I think he’s closer to six or seven.  But July 3rd is it.  The other important information we got from the vet is that he is male.  I can never tell with cats.

So here are some pictures.  Here’s Matthew with his new best friend.









Rosie and Oreo have gotten along from the beginning.  God bless Rosie for not being aggressively territorial.  However, Tiger, our cat of eleven years, has not.  He avoids Oreo, stares at him, and has even hissed at him.  If anyone has advice on how to get an older established cat friendly to a new kitten in the house, I could use it.  No pictures with Tiger yet.  Here’s Matthew sleeping with Oreo.



This recalls when Tiger was a kitten and would love to sleep in Matthew’s bed.  From eleven years ago when Matthew was five years old.

 

 

Let’s end with two more.  Oreo like most babies has bursts of energy and then crashes.  They seem to go in two cycles of two hours of running around and then crashing  Here he is crashing on top of the couch.



And finally what I consider a really beautiful picture, I’ll end with this.



One other note.  The name Oreo was Rochelle's idea.

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Sunday Meditation: You Must Forgive

On the Twenty-Fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time for Year A, Jesus completes His Community Discourse with the requirement to forgive wrongs.   To Peter’s well-known question as to how many times one should forgive a “brother or sister,” Jesus responds “not seven times but seventy-seven times” (or sometimes translated as “seventy times seven,” RSV, 2ndCE).  This is to say infinite.  Jesus then follows that up with the Parable of the Unforgiving Servant.

The infinite number of times one is to forgive, set in the context of the first reading, “Forgive your neighbor’s injustice; then when you pray, your own sins will be forgiven” (Sir 28:2) and combined with the Our Father’s “forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us” makes forgiveness a requirement for salvation.  But it’s even more than that.  In forgiving, God allows you to participate in His Divine action.  You become Godlike in the act of forgiveness.

The parable is a fascinating one.  It will be explicated by the homilists, but I want to touch on one element.  An internet homilist, who I won’t mention by name, but I have embedded his homilies here in the past, last week made a remark about empathy which I think misses the mark.  From a book he read called Suicidal Empathy he reached a conclusion that “empathy is not a supreme value” but acting in love to will the good of the other is.  That’s a false dichotomy.  I will get to the problem with that in a second, but to make matters worse, the homilist framed the issue in political terms: “I think it's the best exposure and take-down of the lunacy at the heart of much of the wokeist philosophy that dominates things today.”  So my first reaction to that was then Jesus doesn’t have a Sacred Heart of infinite compassion?  What then does the Sacred Heart of Jesus mean and what does Divine Mercy mean?

What the homilist gets wrong, in my humble opinion, and I admit I don’t have his stature or education, is that empathy starts the process, and then once connected to the other person’s heart (cor ad cor loquitur, heart speaks to heart from St. John Henry Newman) one reaches a rational plan of action that will address the good of the other.  But empathy is the entrance to that love.  Yes it is a supreme value.

The Parable of the Unforgiving Servant from today's Gospel is a perfect example.  The Master empathizes with the first debtor and releases him from his debt.  That was willing his good and it was a result of his heart being moved.  That debtor then refuses to empathize with the second debtor.  No connection in the heart is sparked, and so he throws second debtor in jail, justice without any empathy.  Jesus then sums it up, “So will my heavenly Father do to you, unless each of you forgives your brother from your heart.”  "From the heart," the center of empathy, is Jesus’s final word on the subject.

 

 


 

Today’s Gospel:

 

 

Peter approached Jesus and asked him,

“Lord, if my brother sins against me,

how often must I forgive?

As many as seven times?”

Jesus answered, “I say to you, not seven times but seventy-seven times.

That is why the kingdom of heaven may be likened to a king

who decided to settle accounts with his servants.

When he began the accounting,

a debtor was brought before him who owed him a huge amount.

Since he had no way of paying it back,

his master ordered him to be sold,

along with his wife, his children, and all his property,

in payment of the debt.

At that, the servant fell down, did him homage, and said,

‘Be patient with me, and I will pay you back in full.’

Moved with compassion the master of that servant

let him go and forgave him the loan.

When that servant had left, he found one of his fellow servants

who owed him a much smaller amount.

He seized him and started to choke him, demanding,

‘Pay back what you owe.’

Falling to his knees, his fellow servant begged him,

‘Be patient with me, and I will pay you back.’

But he refused.

Instead, he had the fellow servant put in prison

until he paid back the debt.

Now when his fellow servants saw what had happened,

they were deeply disturbed, and went to their master

and reported the whole affair.

His master summoned him and said to him, ‘You wicked servant!

I forgave you your entire debt because you begged me to.

Should you not have had pity on your fellow servant,

as I had pity on you?’

Then in anger his master handed him over to the torturers

until he should pay back the whole debt.

So will my heavenly Father do to you,

unless each of you forgives your brother from your heart.”

~Mt: 18:21-35

 

 

For the exegetical homily I go the USCCB’s Fr. Greg Friedman OFM.  This is a short but perfectly explained exegesis.




Fr. Greg:

Today's gospel parable is about the servant whose massive debt had been most generously forgiven by his master, but who in turn refuses to let a fellow servant off forgiving a very minor debt.  When the original master hears of this cruelty, we hear the result. Jesus concludes the parable with a harsh judgment by the master. Should you not have had pity on your fellow servant as I had pity on you? Jesus concludes the parable by describing how in anger his master handed him over to the torturers until he should pay back the whole debt.  After that conclusion, Jesus adds his teaching. So will my heavenly father do to you unless each of you forgives your brother from your heart. Like so many of Jesus parables, the ending shocks us in more than one way. And yet the responsibility for forgiveness is consistent with Jesus teaching earlier in the gospel in the sermon on the mount and with the prayer Christians pray daily. The Lord's prayer forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.

 

The parable today is given as a response to the exchange between Jesus and Peter which precedes it in today's gospel to Peter's question about forgiveness.  Lord, if my brother sins against me, how often must I forgive? As many as seven times. Jesus gives the well-known answer, I say to you, not seven times, but 77 times. The offer of forgiveness seven times seems a reasonable attitude, one I suspect most people today actually would find rather extravagant. As Father Raymond Brown notes in his observations about Peter, Father Brown suggests that most of us might forgive once or twice but let someone offend a third time and we'd probably say enough is enough.  Peter, Father Brown suggests, was being very generous. And yet, the parable is about extreme forgiveness.  The standard Jesus sets is also staggering in its demand. Forgive 77 times which really suggests unending forgiveness.

The parable may be extreme, but Jesus is being serious: forgive or our heavenly Father will not forgive you.

 

For the pastoral homily, I’m returning to Archbishop Edward J. Weisenburger who knocks it out of the park with a great example of extreme forgiveness.



Archbishop Weisenburger:

"And so it shall be with each of you, unless  you forgive your brother from your heart."  Okay, this is serious stuff, a serious  demand. But brothers and sisters, this passage conveys an essential element  of Christianity. It's not something nice, extra. This is of the essence of our faith, and  it cannot be glossed over or denied. Moreover, I fear many of us, and I surely include myself  in that group, many of us would rather apply this demand of Jesus to others, rather than to  ourselves. It's a reflection on that line of the Our Father, where we pray as Jesus did,  saying, "forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who trespass against us." Yes, this teaching  serves as a lasting reminder of our God's demand that we have not simply been called to revel or  glory in His mercy for us, but rather we are to live that same kind of profoundly challenging,  difficult, or daunting mercy in our own lives.

 

Now, as I pondered the parable, I was  reminded of something that happened in my senior year of seminary college. It was during Christmas season of 1983. A photo from Rome flashed across the scene. All around the world, it was the corner of a prison cell.  The subject of the photo: two men hunched over, sitting close together on molded plastic chairs. One in a white cassock with white skull cap, the other in a blue sweater, jeans, and running shoes with no laces. Time magazine told the story accurately, and I quote, "Last week, in an extraordinary moment of grace, the violence in St. Peter Square was transformed.  In a bare, white-walled cell in Rome's Rebibbia Prison, Pope John Paul II tenderly held the hand that held the gun that was meant to kill him. For 21 minutes, the Pope sat with his would-be assassin, Mehmet Ali Agca. The two talked softly. Once or twice, Agca laughed.  The Pope forgave him for the shooting. At the end of the meeting, Agca either kissed the Pope's ring or pressed the Holy Father's hand to his forehead in a Muslim gesture of respect."  End of quote. We're then told later that when asked about what they had talked about, Pope John Paul II responded, "That will have to remain a secret between him and me.  I spoke to him as a brother whom I have pardoned and who has my complete trust."

 




Okay, brothers and sisters, that picture, more expressive than a thousand words. That simple phrase, "a brother whom I have pardoned," continues to challenge us mightily more than four decades after the event took place. It actually gives life to the words of our Gospel today. And in doing so, it challenges us. And not because Pope St. John Paul provides a simple solution to the world's problems of "retaliation versus reconciliation." But quite the contrary, the Pope's words, "I pardoned him," compels me to ask what being a Christian demand of me today in a world that seems increasingly saturated with the cravings of revenge.

 

A picture and a real life example is worth a thousand homiletical words.

 

 


 

Sunday Meditation: “Should you not have had pity on your fellow servant, as I had pity on you?"

 

 

 

Here is a hymn I have never heard before but so beautiful, “Give Me a Heart of Forgiveness” credited to PureFire Worship.



 

Give me a heart of forgiveness, Lord,

Soft and open, like Yours before.

Help me to let go and to love again,

To break these chains and heal within.

Oh, give me a heart,

A heart of forgiveness.

 

Jesus, make my heart like yours.