"Love follows knowledge."
"Beauty above all beauty!"
– St. Catherine of Siena

Sunday, January 4, 2026

Sunday Meditation: Gold, Frankincense, and Myrrh

Today is the Feast of the Epiphany of the Lord.  I’ve had a number of posts on this feast and the subject of the Magi.  You can access past posts on these subjects here.    There are posts on the significance of the Epiphany as well as to its details.  There are posts on Fr. Dwight Longenecker’s wonderful book unlocking the mystery of these wise men, The Mystery of the Magi: The Quest to Identify the Three Wise Men.   And there are analysis of poems by G.K. Chesterton and T.S. Eliot on the subject of the Magi.  All well worth exploring.

Today I would like to emphasize the gifts the Magi present infant Jesus.  It is commonly understood that the gift of gold represents Jesus’ royalty, frankincense represents his priestly office, and myrrh His sacrificial death.  Pierre-Marie Dumont in this month’s Magnificat magazine (Jan 2026, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp 6-7) proposes we offer these gifts to Jesus today in the form of spiritual gifts.  The gold we give is our love, “gold refined by the fire mentioned in the Book of Revelation (3:18).”  The frankincense we offer are our prayers “that ascend to God as a sweet-smelling offering.”  The myrrh we offer is “our communion in the Passion and death of Jesus,” consisting of our sacrifices and offerings to the Lord.  I found that beautiful.


 


Here is today’s Gospel reading.

 

When Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea, in the days of King Herod, behold, magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem, saying, “Where is the newborn king of the Jews?

We saw his star at its rising and have come to do him homage.”

When King Herod heard this, he was greatly troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.

Assembling all the chief priests and the scribes of the people,

He inquired of them where the Christ was to be born.

They said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it has been written through the prophet:

And you, Bethlehem, land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; since from you shall come a ruler, who is to shepherd my people Israel.”

Then Herod called the magi secretly and ascertained from them the time of the star’s appearance.

He sent them to Bethlehem and said,

“Go and search diligently for the child.

When you have found him, bring me word, that I too may go and do him homage.”

After their audience with the king they set out.

And behold, the star that they had seen at its rising preceded them, until it came and stopped over the place where the child was.

They were overjoyed at seeing the star, and on entering the house they saw the child with Mary his mother.

They prostrated themselves and did him homage.

Then they opened their treasures and offered him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh.

And having been warned in a dream not to return to Herod, they departed for their country by another way..

~Mt 2:1-12

 

Bishop Barron explains the traditional understanding of the three gifts, but he also connects the expedition of the Magi with a search for the ultimate fulfillment which is the quest to discover God. 



What is admirable in the Magi is that they follow the sign so that the longing will be fulfilled if we move in this direction.  “We’re the three kings longing for Christ.”  That is beautiful. 

I have presented pastoral homilies by different members of the Capuchin Franciscan Friars before in their YouTube channel, “A Simple Word.”  I have never presented Fr. Christopher Gama before, and here he provides an insightful homily.



We can only find God through the virtue of humility.  “Creation points out the way, and God finishes the path.  Grace builds on nature!”  It changes us and sends us home in another way.

 

Sunday Meditation: “They opened their treasures and offered him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh.”


Let’s end with this lovely Christmas carol perfect for the epiphany, performed by North Valley Chamber Chorale:



I love this version. 

Friday, January 2, 2026

Redeemer in the Womb: Jesus Living in Mary by John Saward, Post #5

This is the fifth post of six posts on Redeemer in the Womb: Jesus Living in Mary by John Saward.

You can find Post #1 here

Post #2 here.  

Post #3 here

Post #4 here

 


 

Chapter 5: First Step Into the World: The French School

Kerstin’s Summary:

In the seventeenth century the French School of Spirituality was inspired by Pierre Cardinal de Bérulle (1575–1629). They devoted much time to Jesus’ time in the womb. Bérulle is quoted throughout the chapter.

 

A ‘Copernican’ Christology

The most marked feature of the theology of Bérulle is its Christ-centeredness. Pope Urban VIII called him “the Apostle of the Word incarnate,” and one of his successors as superior general of the French Oratory, Fr. Bourgoing, suggested he had been sent by God “as a new St. John to point out Jesus Christ.” Bérulle worked a ‘Copernican revolution’ in the sacred sciences. He attempted in theology what his older contemporary Galileo achieved in astronomy.

“One of the outstanding intellects of this age has tried to maintain that the sun, and not the earth, is at the center of the universe. . . . This novel opinion, little followed in the science of the stars, is useful and must be followed in the science of salvation. For Jesus is the sun, immobile in his grandeur and moving all things. . . . Jesus is the true center of the world, and the world must be in a continual movement towards him. Jesus is the sun of our souls, from whom they receive all graces, lights, and influences.”

The Lodgings of the Son of God Like the Syriac theologians, Bérulle compares and links the diverse lodgings (séjours) of Jesus: the bosom of God the Father, the womb of the Blessed Virgin, and the altars of the Catholic Church.

“There are three states of Jesus that deserve singular and daily consideration: in the womb (sein) of the Father as Son of God, God from God, consubstantial and equal with his Father; in the womb of the Virgin as Son of Man, both man and God, the Mediator of God and men; in the womb of the Church, which is his centre and altar, as Lamb of God and victim of praise and propitiation, which she [the Church] presents to the eternal Father.”

The marvel of the Incarnation is this: it enables God to worship God. God the Son in his humanity adores God the Father, with whom, in his divinity, he is coequal. What is more, this filial worship of the Father begins at the first moment of the Incarnation and has its first sanctuary in the Virgin’s womb.
[…]Bérulle follows St. Thomas’ teaching that, from the first moment of his conception, Christ has the use of his human free will and at the summit of his soul enjoys the beatific vision of God.
“He is living in the Virgin, and he is life itself. He is holy by the grace of the hypostatic union, which is the grace of graces. He is in glory by the state of his soul, established at the very hour of its making in the vision of God.

 

The Unborn State of Christ

 

The Christology of Bérulle is a doctrine of état, “state.” […] Bérulle uses état in the latter sense to revive St. Irenaeus’ theology of recapitulation and the Thomist doctrine of Christ’s headship. As man, but because he is God, Christ is “the head of human nature.” In assuming a complete and concrete human nature, the eternal Word in some way unites himself to all men, and, by living a complete human life from conception to the last breath, he touches and hallows every stage of every man’s journey through this world.

 

“By this high, divine, and lofty counsel, we do not just have a Man-God, which is what the Incarnation gives us. We have an infant God, a mortal God, suffering, trembling, weeping in a cradle; a God living and walking on earth, in Egypt, in Judaea. . . . God wants us to have all the miseries, conditions, and lowlinesses of our nature relieved by the divine subsistence and personality, a God suffering and dying on the cross, a God dead in the tomb, for he who took our nature by the mystery of the Incarnation wanted to take all these states and conditions of our nature and to honour them with the divine subsistence, what the ancient Fathers of the Church call the economy and dispensation of the divine mystery. For the Incarnation of the Word is the basis and foundation of a supreme dignity, in other words, not only of the sanctification but also of the deification of all the states and mysteries that share the life and wayfaring condition of the Son of God on earth.”

 

The human conception of the Son of God and his life in the womb have a redeeming purpose. The virginal and miraculous character of his conception and his perfections as a human child in the womb are intended “to repair the ruins of our pitiful entry into the world as sinners.”

 

“Seeing that he wanted to be an infant on earth, in order to consecrate and sanctify human infancy contaminated by Original Sin, could this infancy have been better restored than by a Virginal Conception, a miraculous birth, a light of glory before the light of the world, a divine power in the powerlessness of the Child, the use of a holy and perfect life with God his Father and the Virgin his Mother before the use of his senses and the force of nature?”

 

“But we see sensibly that in this present state she is more close and more conjoined, while he is in her, while he is part of her, while she lives for him, and he lives by her, and he is in a continual state of dependence and even of indigence with regard to her.”



 

The Visitation

 

The Visitation, says Bérulle, is the only visible work reported by Scripture that Jesus and Mary performed during the nine months the divine baby was in his Mother’s womb.

 

“God has become a child, and so he wants first to be known and adored by a child, and this is one of the first emanations of the childhood of God, manifesting himself to the universe. God is a child, the world ignores, heaven adores, and a child is the first person in the universe to recognize and adore him, and he does so by the homage and secret operation of God himself, who wants to act upon children. He wants to honour himself as child by giving the first knowledge of himself to a child in the world, making him his prophet in the universe. Thus, the Infant-God is recognized and manifested, not by an angel, but by a child. His first prophet is a child, just as shortly his first martyrs will be children.”

 

Jesus in Mary: A Union of Hearts

 

Between any expectant mother and the child in her womb, there is more than a merely physical presence of the one to the other, of the one in the other. The bodily closeness is the basis of an intimacy of knowledge and love, a union of hearts. This natural bond is wonderfully strengthened by the unique fullness of grace with which the God-man and his Mother, each in their own way, are endowed.

 

“All her senses are directed at him, for this is a sensible mystery, a mystery that is sensible in her. And the whole of human sensibility owes homage to its God made sensible for human nature. All her spirit is applied there. . . . The grace infused into the Virgin, grace so excellent and exalted, applies and absorbs all the senses, all the faculties, and all the spirit of the Virgin. . . . Thus grace and nature conspire in her to establish an excellent disposition, one that enraptures her heart and her soul in Jesus her Son and her God.”

 

The French Poet Paul Claudel expressed it in this way:

 

At the end of this third month after the Annunciation,

which is June,

The woman who is God’s has heard the tune

Of heartbeats under hers and felt the movement

of her Son.

Within the sinless Virgin’s womb commences a new era.

The Child who is before all time assumes time in his

Mother of his Mother,

And in the primal Mover man’s breathing is begun!

She moves not, speaks not a word. She adores.

She withdraws from the world. For her, God is not

outdoors:

He is her work, her Son, her Baby, borne as her All!

Satan rules and the whole wide world offers him incense

and gold.

God penetrates like a thief in this Eden of death

overbold.

A woman was once deceived, and now a woman

cheats hell.

O God, in a woman hid! O Cause, in this bondage

bound!

Jerusalem knows naught; even Joseph sees darkness

profound.

The Mother alone with her Child feels his ineffable

moving.

 

For nine months, says Bérulle, Mary is the only person on earth who worships the mystery of the Incarnation. It takes place “on the earth, for the earth, and yet is not known by the earth.” For the benefit of the whole world, Mary alone in the world worships Jesus.

 

The Graces of Mary’s Womb Burden

 

Jesus . . . in his states and mysteries is himself our portion, and, while giving us a universal share in him, he wants us also to have an individual share in his diverse states depending on the different ways in which he has elected us and we are devoted to him. Thus, he shares himself with his children, making them partakers of the spirit and grace of his mysteries, appropriating to some his life and to others his death, to some his infancy, to others his power, to some his hidden life, to others his public life. . . . In all these different states and conditions he gives himself to all. He gives us his heart, his grace, and his spirit.

 

The infancy of the Son of God is a passing state. Its circumstances have passed away. He is no longer a child. Nevertheless, there is something divine in this mystery that continues in heaven and that effects a similar kind of grace in the souls who are on earth, whom it pleases Jesus Christ to affect and to dedicate to this humble and first state of his person.

 

The Good by God the Christ an Embryo:

 

From which His conceiving we may conceive His great love to us-ward. Love, not only condescending to take our nature upon Him, but to take it by the same way and after the same manner that we do, by being conceived. That, and no other better beseeming way. The womb of the Virgin is surely no such place, but He might well have abhorred it. He did not; pudorem exordii nostri non recusavit, saith Hilary; “He refused not that ourselves are ashamed of,” sed naturae nostrae contumelias transcurrit, “but the very contumelies of our nature (transcurrit is too quick a word) He ran through them”; nay, He stayed in them, in this first nine months. I say the contumelies of our nature not to be named, they are so mean. So mean indeed as it is verily thought they made those old heretics I named, and others more who yet yielded Him to be Man, to run into such fancies as they did; only to decline those foul indignities as they took them, for the great God of Heaven to undergo. . . . This sure is matter of love; but came there any good to us by it? There did. For our conception being the root as it were, the very groundsill of our nature; that He might go to the root and repair our nature from the very foundation, thither He went; that what had been there defiled and decayed by the first Adam, might by the Second be cleansed and set right again. That had our conception been stained, by Him therefore, primum ante omnia, to be restored again. He was not idle all the time He was an embryo—all the nine months He was in the womb. . . . This honour is to us by the dishonour of Him; this the good by Christ an embryo.

 

“Oh Wonderful and Incomprehensible Dependence of God”

 

St. Louis-Marie On Jesus in Mary’s Womb:

 

Jesus is at present, as much as he ever was, the fruit of Mary, as heaven and earth tell him a thousand times every day, “And blessed is the fruit of thy womb.” It is certain that, for every human being in particular who possesses him, Jesus Christ is as truly the fruit and the work of Mary as he is for the whole world in general, so that, if a faithful Christian has Jesus Christ formed in his heart, he can boldly say, “Great thanks to Mary, what I possess is her fruit and her work, and without her I would not have him.”

 


###

My Comment:

I found this surprising:

 

In the history of the Church, no school of theology and spirituality has given Jesus’ life in Mary more attention than the seventeenth-century French School, of which Pierre Cardinal de Bérulle (1575–1629)…was the chief inspiration.

 

I suppose that’s true. Until this book I had not realized there had been much contemplation of Jesus inside of Mary’s womb.

Frances’s Reply:

I hadn’t either, Manny.

Michelle’s Reply:

This book is the first time I've come across it. It's pretty clueless, but I never really gave much thought to it.

Michael’s Reply on a Different Thought:

Manny wrote: "I found this surprising:
In the history of the Church, no school of theology and spirituality has given Jesus’ life in Mary more attention than the seventeenth-century French School, of which Pierre Cardinal de Bérulle (1575–1629)…was the chief inspiration."


So interesting, Manny. I'll look into it. I think my wife has a book on French Catholic Church spirituality.

###

My Comment:

I found this passage in chapter 5 fascinating and worth deeper meditation.

 

The marvel of the Incarnation is this: it enables God to worship God. God the Son in his humanity adores God the Father, with whom, in his divinity, he is coequal. What is more, this filial worship of the Father begins at the first moment of the Incarnation and has its first sanctuary in the Virgin’s womb. Bérulle, who had a thorough knowledge of the Greek Fathers, repeats what Cyril, Proclus, and Andrew of Crete had recognized before him—namely, that the Virgin’s pure womb, unshadowed by any sin, containing the divine Word himself, is “the holy or sacred temple where Jesus reposes, the true Ark of the true Covenant . . . and the Virgin’s heart is the first altar on which Jesus offered his heart, his body, his spirit, as a victim of perpetual praise.” When Christ comes into the world, he surrenders his new human body and will to the service of the Father: “Lo, I have come to do thy will, O God” (Heb. 10:5–10; cf. Ps. 40:6–8).

 

That God the Son adores God the Father is evident in John’s chapter seventeen when Jesus gives His farewell discourse and great final prayer.

 

When Jesus had said this, he raised his eyes to heaven and said, “Father, the hour has come. Give glory to your son, so that your son may glorify you, just as you gave him authority over all people, so that he may give eternal life to all you gave him. Now this is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ. I glorified you on earth by accomplishing the work that you gave me to do. Now glorify me, Father, with you, with the glory that I had with you before the world began. (Jn 17:1-5)

 

I’m surprised Seward doesn’t allude to it, but here God worships God, the Father the Son and the Son the Father. I guess one could see this worship beginning in the womb with the Incarnation. John’s passage is a statement of the hour of His glory, when at the altar of the cross Jesus will offer Himself in sacrifice. Bérulle see the Virgin’s heart as the very first altar.

###

Note: While in discussion of Chapter 5, Kerstin received an emergency call that her mother in Germany, who was battling cancer, was in a critical state.  She had to rush to Germany.  I took over as lead moderator for the last three chapters.

###

Chapter 6: Our Lady of the Sign: The Liturgy and Sacred Art

My Summary:

This chapter explores how Our Lady, pregnant with Jesus, has shaped the liturgical season, shaped various liturgies, and shaped sacred art. 

 

Saward on the Liturgical Season:

When the eternal God enters time in the Virgin’s womb, time itself is redeemed (see Eph. 5:16). Days and seasons can now be holy and sanctifying and the year becomes liturgical. As she makes the journey from Advent to the last Sunday after Pentecost, the Church relives the mysteries of the life of Jesus, joyful and luminous, sorrowful and glorious, drawing from each a specific grace and lesson. Pope Pius XII writes: The Liturgical Year, devotedly nourished and accompanied by the Church, is not a cold and lifeless representation of the events of the past, nor a simple and bare record of a former age. It is rather Christ himself, ever living in his Church, continuing the journey of boundless mercy that he began in his mortal life when he went about doing good (see Acts 10:38). Its compassionate purpose is to put the minds of men into contact with his mysteries and somehow to live by them. . . .  (p. 103)

 

In a sermon on the Annunciation, St. Aelred, Cistercian abbot of Rievaulx (1109-1167), suggested we become contemporary with all the mysteries of our lord’s life on earth, from the first moment of the Incarnation, through the renewal and representation in the Mass of his sacrifice on the cross, which summed up and perfected all the previous mysteries.  (p. 105)

 

The mystery of Jesus’ life in Mary’s womb is always ‘recent’ in the Church’s memory.  Every evening she sings the Magnificat, the song of the pregnant Virgin Mother, in order to share more fully in her attitude of gratitude and obedience to God.  And at the end of each year, in preparation for the Saviour’s birthday, she enjoys a month’s contemplation of the same mystery.   (p. 105)

 

Saward on the Use of Mary in the Liturgy:

The traditional Advent liturgies thus clearly distinguish and separately celebrate the first moment of the incarnation at the Annunciation, when the Son of God took flesh upon himself in the Virgin’s womb without seed, from its first manifestation at the Nativity, when the Son of God in the flesh came forth from the Virgin’s womb without corruption.  (p. 106)

 

The name of the Mother of God is found on almost every page of the Byzantine liturgical books.  In every sacrament and office, in the celebration of each mystery of Christ’s life, the Panagia (“All-Holy One”) is present, in and with the Church, interceding, contemplating, and adoring.  Her bearing of the Father’s consubstantial Son for nine months in her womb is indelibly imprinted on the liturgical consciousness of the East.    (p. 109)

 

In the Akathist hymn of the Byzantine rite, now an indulgence prayer for all Catholics, the Theotokos is praised as the fulfillment of all the sanctuaries of the Old Testament.

 

All who hymn thy childbearing praise thee, Mother of God, as an animate temple, for thy womb dwelt the Lord who holds thee in his hand.  He it was who sanctified thee, glorified thee, and taught all to cry out to thee:

Hail, tabernacle of God and the Word!

Hail, greater holy of holies!

Hail, Spirit-gilded ark!

Hail, treasury of unexhausted life!

 



Saward on Our Lady in Art:

One of the most ancient and best-loved icons of the Byzantine tradition, “Our Lady of Sign,” shows the Theotokos with her hands extended in prayer and with the Holy Child in her womb.  The “sign” is the Virginal Conception and Birth prophesied by Isaiah, “the fifth evangelist”:

 

Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign.  Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son: and his name shall be Emmanuel.  (Isa. 7:14)

 

The Child visible in the womb is the pre-eternal God…The perpetual virginity of God’s Mother is marked by the three stars on her veil, two on her shoulder and one above her brow.  Before and in Jesus’ birth, and forever after, Mary is Virgin.  (p. 112)

 

Images of Jesus in his Mother’s womb are also found in the West.  For example, there is the relief carved by Bartolomeo Buon in the middle of the fifteenth century for the tympanum over the principal doorway of the Scuolo vecchia di Santa Maria della Misericordia in Venice.  Our Lady covers the kneeling members of the Guild of Mercy with her cloak.  The Infant Jesus, his hand raised in blessing, is enthroned within a mandorla in the center of the Virgin’s body.  In the Madonna del Parto of Piero della Francesca, painted in about 1460, the expectant Virgin stands motionless in regal dignity.  Her left hand is on her hip.  Her right points to her womb.  On either side, angels hold back heavy velvet drapes.  They veil and guard the awful mystery.  (p.  114)

 


Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Redeemer in the Womb: Jesus Living in Mary by John Saward, Post #4

This is the fourth post of several posts on Redeemer in the Womb: Jesus Living in Mary by John Saward.

You can find Post #1 here

Post #2 here.  

Post #3 here 




Chapter 4: Perfection from Conception: The Middle Ages

Kerstin’s Introduction:

The Middle Ages had a deep fascination with Jesus in Mary’s womb. “The new religious foundations of the Middle Ages—first the Cistercians, later the Franciscans—excelled in devotion to the humanity of Christ and to the mysteries of his life on earth, not least its very first months.” They pondered on the two distinct natures of Christ and how he developed in the womb, the one not diminishing the other.

 

From the very moment the Word was made flesh, the Lord Jesus carried his cross. From that moment he was truly a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief. We believe the evangelist signified this when he said that “the Word was made flesh.” By “flesh” he meant the capacity of the flesh to suffer and to suffer with. For what in all creation is more fragile than flesh, more delicate than flesh? Fragility, therefore, corresponds to Passion, suffering; delicacy to Com-passion, suffering-with. From these two, as from two planks, Christ’s cross is constructed. For to suffer and to suffer with, as St. Gregory says, is Christ’s true cross, namely, affliction of body and compassion of mind, provided such a cross is borne for Christ and following Christ. Christ carried this kind of cross from his entry into his Mother’s womb. He endured the confines of the virginal womb.

 

The Franciscans

Devotion to the infancy of Christ, including his first nine months of life, is one of the pillars of Franciscan spirituality. […] Of the Virgin’s womb, he says it is a temple made by the Father’s power, adorned by the wisdom of the Son, dedicated by the grace of the Holy Spirit, and filled by the presence of the Word made flesh to be his “special temple and hospice.”

 

St. Thomas Aquinas

…the monastic theologians of the twelfth century, following the Fathers, readily attributed the fullness of the grace of the Holy Spirit to the soul of Christ from his conception. […] The embryonic Christ is holy, the holy of holies, and at the same time he is hallowing; his grace is intended to overflow to others. The personal grace by which Christ’s soul is sanctified is really identical with the grace that makes him Head of the Church, sanctifying others. […] The loving knowledge with which the divine Redeemer has pursued us from the first moment of his Incarnation surpasses all the powers of the human mind; for by means of the beatific vision, which he enjoyed from the time he was received into the womb of the Mother of God, he has forever and continuously had present to him all the members of his Mystical Body and embraced them with his saving love.

 

Some modern theologians cannot handle these writings. The abilities attributed to the infant Christ do not coincide with human development in the womb and early childhood. What modern man fails to see is the ability of the child to perceive God uninhibited.

 

In every little one of the human family there are hidden spiritual depths to which modern Western culture, materialistic and mechanistic, contra-life and contra-child, blinds the eyes of the mind. If God-made-man is true and perfect man, we should expect there to be capacities realized in his childhood that in us remain mostly dormant.



Mother of the Eucharist

The same body of Christ that the most blessed Virgin brought forth, which she nourished in her womb, wrapped in swaddling clothes and brought up with motherly care: this same body, I say, and none other, we now perceive without any doubt on the sacred altar.

If you believe that flesh to have been created from the Virgin MaMary in the womb without seed by the power of the Holy Spirit, so that the Word became flesh, truly believe that this body taken from the Virgin is confected [in the Eucharist] by the word of Christ and through the Holy Spirit.

You, Mary, are Mother of the Eucharist, because you are Mother of Grace. . . . If, with your mercy and help, we receive your Son in the Sacrament of the Eucharist, he will surely receive us and incorporate us into his Mystical Body.




###

 

My Comment:

Short Summary: Meditations on Mary’s carrying of Jesus in the womb from the Medieval theologians.

 

The contrast of the nature of Christ’s intellect of St. Bernard of Clairvaux with that of the scholastics is interesting.  St. Bernard postulates:

 

Even while he was still unborn, Jesus was a man, not in age, but in wisdom, in vigor of mind, not of body, in the maturity of his mental powers, not in the development of his members. For Jesus was not less wise, or rather I should say was not less Wisdom, at his conception than after his birth, when he was a little one than when he was full-grown. Whether he was lying hidden in the womb or wailing in the manger, whether as a growing lad questioning the doctors in the Temple or as a man of mature age teaching among the people, he was in truth equally full of the Holy Spirit.

 

Here he is postulating that Jesus had the wisdom, and, therefore, mind of a grown man even while a fetus in the womb.  I think St. Bernard failed to realize—at least in this passage; Saward goes on to say Bernard elsewhere acknowledged Christ’s human nature—that though Christ has a God side to His nature, he also has a developing human nature.

 

If this monastic theology has a shortcoming, it is its failure to state explicitly what Scholastic theology will later explain: there can be growth at one level of Christ’s human knowledge and an abiding fullness at another. In the century after St. Bernard, St. Thomas Aquinas will confess that he himself “advanced in wisdom” on the subject of Christ’s “advance in wisdom” and came eventually to attribute a real acquired (experimental) knowledge to Christ.

 

I have always found this hard to keep straight myself.  Christ as one person had one mind but He has two natures, a human nature and a divine nature.  As one person, He has one brain but that brain develops as a human develops and so has the knowledge of comparable human at a given age, but that one brain has a divine nature and functions as the omniscient knowledge of God.  I hope I got that right.  Someone correct me if I didn’t.

 

Michelle’s Reply to My Comment:

I think that's what was meant, although I somehow left this section with the impression that although omniscient, He chose to bring the human nature to the forefront. He could access His divine nature at will, but wanted to live fully as a human, even while in His mother's womb.

 

Now someone please also correct me if I got that wrong!

 

My Reply to Michelle:

LOL, I think we're saying the same thing. :)

###



My Comment:

The one thing I found interesting in the scholastic section was St. Thomas Aquinas’ notion that the fetus Jesus was able to see the beatific vision in the womb despite His human development not being sufficient. 

 

Some modern theologians are embarrassed by this view of Christ’s prenatal perfections. They imagine it makes his humanity, if not unreal, at least incredible. Psychology, they argue, has shown that mental development from infancy to adulthood is intrinsic to human life, so that a child already free, already in the bliss of man’s final destiny, would hardly seem to count as a child. He would be a sad infant prodigy, robbed of his childhood. In my opinion, however, St. Thomas’ doctrine of Christ’s “perfections from conception” has much to teach us. It affirms truths about infancy and thus the unborn Infant God to which modern minds have grown oblivious.

 

To the criticisms of recent writers, St. Thomas would answer that whatever graced the unborn Christ Child perfected, but did not destroy, his real unborn human childhood. He quotes St. Leo the Great with approval: apart from the virginal manner of his conception and birth, the Child Jesus is “in no way dissimilar to the generality of human infancy.” The marvels of the extraordinary ‘beatific knowledge’ at his soul’s summit (superior pars animae) do not rob its lower slopes of their precious ordinariness. The Child Jesus is both “pilgrim” and “beholder.” He sees the Father in a childlike way. The One whom he sees and the sublime act of his human intellect by which he sees him are unchanging, but how that seeing bears upon the rest of his human experience depends on the stage of life in which he finds himself. Likewise, the knowledge “infused” by the Holy Spirit into his “possible” (receptive) intellect does not interfere with the normal process of growth in knowledge through the operation of his “agent” intellect. St. Thomas’ doctrine of Christ’s human knowledge does not lead to the ridiculous conclusion that, in his Mother’s womb, the Holy Child “was thinking about the theorems of hydrodynamics and the Battle of Hastings.” The infused knowledge is habitual, not actual: it is a store on which our Lord can draw when he has the need, not an instrument he is perpetually exercising.34 In the womb, he is not engaged in the adult business of thinking at all. He is doing something much more important: in the earthly paradise of his Mother’s body, he is resting and seeing, loving and praising, God his heavenly Father.

 

So what did Jesus think about in the womb? According to Aquinas He was contemplating the Father “in a childlike way, “infused” by the Holy Spirit. But it does not interfere with His human development! How? I cannot conceptualize it…lol.

Kerstin’s Reply to My Comment:

I had difficulties with this part as well. It is hard enough to conceptualize the hypostatic union for the adult Jesus.

My Reply to Kerstin:

Yes!

Michelle’s Reply:

I don't feel as stupid now. We all had trouble here 😀

Michael’s Reply:

Manny wrote: "So what did Jesus think about in the womb?"

A stunning question. What did Jesus think about? Not only in the womb, but always, in his days. While working, while walking, while observing others, or his Mother. I'd never thought 'bout this and had missed this point in reading the book. I'll prob be thinking about it all day.

My Reply to Michael:

You know, when I wrote that I didn't realize the profundity of the question. And your expansion of the thought is even more profound. I can't even imagine how to answer it.

Michelle’s Reply to Michael:

These thoughts are superb, Michael. You just gave me more to think about, in a good way.

My Comment:

So what did Jesus think about in the womb?  According to Aquinas He was contemplating the Father “in a childlike way, “infused” by the Holy Spirit.  But it does not interfere with His human development!  How?  I cannot conceptualize it…lol.